Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Correction: Reed Solomon Codes Against Adversarial Insertions and Deletions (IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (2023) 69:5 (2991-3000) DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2023.3237711)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this note is to correct an error made by Con et al. (2023), specifically in the proof of Theorem 9. Here we correct the proof but as a consequence we get a slightly weaker result. In Theorem9, we claimed that for integers k and n such that k < n/9, there exists an [n,k]q RS code that can decode from n - 2k + 1 insdel errors where (Formula presented). Here we prove the following. Theorem 1: For integers n and k < n/9, there exists an [n,k]q RS-code, where (Formula presented) is a prime power, that can decode from n - 2k + 1 adversarial insdel errors. Note that the exponent of n is 4k - 3 whereas in Theorem 9 it is 4k - 4. For constant dimensional codes, the field size is of order O(n4k-3) , and in particular, for k = 2 the field size is of order O(n5) .

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3237-3238
Number of pages2
JournalIEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Volume71
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Funding

FundersFunder number
Blavatnik Family Foundation
Marco Dalai
Bkvl Family Foundation
Israel Science Foundation1030 /15, 514, 514/20
European Research Council852953

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Correction: Reed Solomon Codes Against Adversarial Insertions and Deletions (IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (2023) 69:5 (2991-3000) DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2023.3237711)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this