TY - JOUR
T1 - Continued vigilance - development of an online evaluation tool for assessing preparedness of medical facilities for biological events
AU - Adini, Bruria
AU - Verbeek, Luzie
AU - Trapp, Susanna
AU - Schilling, Stefan
AU - Sasse, Julia
AU - Pientka, Kathrin
AU - Böddinghaus, Boris
AU - Schaefer, Helene
AU - Schempf, Jörg
AU - Brodt, Reinhard
AU - Wegner, Christian
AU - Lev, Boaz
AU - Laor, Daniel
AU - Gottschalk, Rene
AU - Biederbick, Walter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Adini, Verbeek, Trapp, Schilling, Sasse, Pientka, Böddinghaus, Schaefer, Schempf, Brodt, Wegner, Lev, Laor, Gottschalk and Biederbick.
PY - 2014/4/14
Y1 - 2014/4/14
N2 - Objective: Effective response to biological events necessitates ongoing evaluation of preparedness. This study was a bilateral German-Israeli collaboration aimed at developing an evaluation tool for assessing preparedness of medical facilities for biological events. Methods: Measurable parameters were identified through a literature review for inclusion in the evaluation tool and disseminated to 228 content experts in two modified Delphi cycles. Focus groups were conducted to identify psychosocial needs of the medical teams. Table-top and functional exercises were implemented to review applicability of the tool. Results: One hundred seventeen experts from Germany and Israel participated in the modified Delphi. Out of 188 parameters that were identified, 183 achieved a consensus of >75% of the content experts. Following comments recommended in the Delphi cycles, and feedback from focus groups and hospital exercises, the final tool consisted of 172 parameters. Median level of importance of each parameter was calculated based on ranking recommended in the Delphi process. Computerized web-based software was developed to calculate scores of preparedness for biological events. Conclusion: Ongoing evaluation means, such as the tool developed in the study, can facilitate the need for a valid and reliable mechanism that may be widely adopted and implemented as quality assurance measures. The tool is based on measurable parameters and indicators that can effectively present strengths and weaknesses in managing a response to a public health threat, and accordingly, steps can be implemented to improve readiness. Adoption of such a tool is an important component of assuring public health and effective emergency management.
AB - Objective: Effective response to biological events necessitates ongoing evaluation of preparedness. This study was a bilateral German-Israeli collaboration aimed at developing an evaluation tool for assessing preparedness of medical facilities for biological events. Methods: Measurable parameters were identified through a literature review for inclusion in the evaluation tool and disseminated to 228 content experts in two modified Delphi cycles. Focus groups were conducted to identify psychosocial needs of the medical teams. Table-top and functional exercises were implemented to review applicability of the tool. Results: One hundred seventeen experts from Germany and Israel participated in the modified Delphi. Out of 188 parameters that were identified, 183 achieved a consensus of >75% of the content experts. Following comments recommended in the Delphi cycles, and feedback from focus groups and hospital exercises, the final tool consisted of 172 parameters. Median level of importance of each parameter was calculated based on ranking recommended in the Delphi process. Computerized web-based software was developed to calculate scores of preparedness for biological events. Conclusion: Ongoing evaluation means, such as the tool developed in the study, can facilitate the need for a valid and reliable mechanism that may be widely adopted and implemented as quality assurance measures. The tool is based on measurable parameters and indicators that can effectively present strengths and weaknesses in managing a response to a public health threat, and accordingly, steps can be implemented to improve readiness. Adoption of such a tool is an important component of assuring public health and effective emergency management.
KW - Biological event
KW - Disaster management
KW - Evaluation of emergency preparedness
KW - Measurable indicators
KW - Standard operating procedures
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937642218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00035
DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00035
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 24783192
AN - SCOPUS:84937642218
VL - 2
JO - Frontiers in Public Health
JF - Frontiers in Public Health
SN - 2296-2565
IS - APR
M1 - 35
ER -