ConSurf 2005: The projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures

Meytal Landau, Itay Mayrose, Yossi Rosenberg, Fabian Glaser, Eric Martz, Tal Pupko, Nir Ben-Tal*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1185 Scopus citations

Abstract

Key amino acid positions that are important for maintaining the 3D structure of a protein and/or its function(s), e.g. catalytic activity, binding to ligand, DNA or other proteins, are often under strong evolutionary constraints. Thus, the biological importance of a residue often correlates with its level of evolutionary conservation within the protein family. ConSurf (http://consurf.tau.ac.il/) is a web-based tool that automatically calculates evolutionary conservation scores and maps them on protein structures via a user-friendly interface. Structurally and functionally important regions in the protein typically appear as patches of evolutionarily conserved residues that are spatially close to each other. We present here version 3.0 of ConSurf. This new version includes an empirical Bayesian method for scoring conservation, which is more accurate than the maximum-likelihood method that was used in the earlier release. Various additional steps in the calculation can now be controlled by a number of advanced options, thus further improving the accuracy of the calculation. Moreover, ConSurf version 3.0 also includes a measure of confidence for the inferred amino acid conservation scores.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)W299-W302
JournalNucleic Acids Research
Volume33
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005

Funding

FundersFunder number
Division of Undergraduate Education of the US National Science Foundation
Yeshaia Horvitz Association
Israel Cancer Research Fund
Israel Science Foundation1208/04

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'ConSurf 2005: The projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this