Constructions of low-degree and error-correcting ∈-biased generators

Amir Shpilka*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this work we give two new constructions of ∈-biased generators. Our first construction significantly extends a result of Mossel et al. (Random Structures and Algorithms 2006, pages 56-81), and our second construction answers an open question of Dodis and Smith (STOC 2005, pages 654-663). In particular we obtain the following results: 1. For every k = o(log n) we construct an ∈-biased generator G: {0, 1}m → {0, 1}n that is implementable by degree k polynomials (namely, every output bit of the generator is a degree k polynomial in the input bits). For any constant k we get that n = Ω(m/log(1/∈))k, which is nearly optimal. Our result also separates degree k generators from generators in NC0k, showing that the stretch of the former can be much larger than the stretch of the latter. The problem of constructing degree k generators was introduced by Mossel et al. who gave a construction only for the case of k = 2. 2. We construct a family of asymptotically good binary codes such that the codes in our family are also ∈-biased sets for an exponentially small ∈. Our encoding algorithm runs in polynomial time in the block length of the code. Moreover, these codes have a polynomial time decoding algorithm. This answers an open question of Dodis and Smith. The paper also contains an appendix by Venkatesan Guruswami that provides an explicit construction of a family of error correcting codes of rate 1/2 that has efficient encoding and decoding algorithms and whose dual codes are also good codes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)495-525
Number of pages31
JournalComputational Complexity
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Error correcting codes
  • Explicit constructions
  • Low degree polynomials
  • ∈-biassed generators

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Constructions of low-degree and error-correcting ∈-biased generators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this