Concordance between Self-reported Symptoms and Clinically Ascertained Peripheral Neuropathy among Childhood Cancer Survivors: The St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study

Samah Hayek, Rikeenkumar Dhaduk, Yadav Sapkota, William E. Evans, Barthelemy Diouf, Kari Bjornard, Carmen L. Wilson, Melissa M. Hudson, Leslie L. Robison, Raja B. Khan, Deo Kumar Srivastava, Kevin R. Krull, Kirsten K. Ness*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Childhood cancer survivors are at elevated risk for motor and/or sensory neuropathy. The study aims to evaluate the concordance between self-report peripheral neuropathy compared with clinically ascertained peripheral neuropathy, and to identify factors associated with misclassification of peripheral neuropathy among survivors. Methods: The concordance between self-report and clinically ascertained peripheral neuropathy was evaluated among 2,933 5þ years old childhood cancer survivors (mean age 33.3, SD = 8.9). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of self-report peripheral motor neuropathy (PMN) and peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) were calculated with reference to clinically assessed peripheral neuropathy. Results: Female survivors were more likely than male survivors to have clinically ascertained PMN (8.4% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.004). For females, having either PSN or PMN the most sensitive, specific, and accurate self-reported symptom was endorsing ≥2 symptoms on the self-report questionnaire (43.2%, 90.3%, and 85.2%, respectively), with kappa of 0.304. For males, having either PSN or PMN the most sensitive, specific, and accurate self-reported symptom was endorsing ≥2 symptoms on the self-report questionnaire (38.8%, 90.5%, and 86.3%, respectively) with kappa of 0.242. Age at diagnosis, emotional distress, and reporting pain in legs in the past 4 weeks were associated with an increased risk for false-positive reporting of peripheral neuropathy. Race (White), age at assessment, and emotional distress were associated with increased risk for false-negative reporting of peripheral neuropathy. Conclusions: Agreement between self-report and clinically ascertained peripheral neuropathy was poor in survivors. Choosing self-report versus clinical ascertained peripheral neuropathy should be carefully considered. Impact: The current study identifies the need for a self-report questionnaire that accurately assesses symptoms of peripheral neuropathy among cancer survivors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2256-2267
Number of pages12
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume30
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
National Institutes of Health
National Cancer InstituteP30CA021765, U01CA195547
National Cancer Institute
American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Concordance between Self-reported Symptoms and Clinically Ascertained Peripheral Neuropathy among Childhood Cancer Survivors: The St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this