TY - JOUR
T1 - Concomitant docetaxel plus gemcitabine versus sequential docetaxel followed by gemcitabine in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic or locally recurrent inoperable breast cancer patients
T2 - A prospective multicentre trial of the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG)
AU - Tomova, Antoaneta
AU - Bartsch, Rupert
AU - Brodowicz, Thomas
AU - Tzekova, Valentina
AU - Timcheva, Constanta
AU - Wiltschke, Christoph
AU - Gerges, Dany Abi
AU - Pawlega, Jan
AU - Spanik, Stanislav
AU - Inbar, Moshe
AU - Zielinski, Christoph C.
PY - 2010/1
Y1 - 2010/1
N2 - Docetaxel (D) plus gemcitabine (G) is an active combination in anthracycline pre-treated breast cancer. Impact of sequential administration of these drugs is unclear. This trial aimed to compare concomitant DG with sequential D → G. Patients were randomised to eight cycles of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 + 8 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 8, or 4 cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by four cycles of gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 on days 1 + 8, in a 21-day schedule. Time to progression (TTP) was defined as primary endpoint; secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), response duration (RD), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Due to poor recruitment, the trial was terminated after 100 of a pre-planned 430 patients. Patient characteristics were well balanced. No significant difference was observed in terms of TTP, ORR, RD and OS. Grade 3/4 adverse events encompassed leucopoenia (29 vs. 68%, P < 0.001), neutropoenia (49 vs. 83%, P < 0.001) and febrile neutropoenia (4 vs. 9%, n.s.), all favouring D → G. No difference in efficacy was observed between concomitant and sequential treatment. D → G produced significantly more episodes of haematological toxicity due to the administration of docetaxel at 100 mg/m2 without GCSF-support.
AB - Docetaxel (D) plus gemcitabine (G) is an active combination in anthracycline pre-treated breast cancer. Impact of sequential administration of these drugs is unclear. This trial aimed to compare concomitant DG with sequential D → G. Patients were randomised to eight cycles of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 + 8 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 8, or 4 cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by four cycles of gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 on days 1 + 8, in a 21-day schedule. Time to progression (TTP) was defined as primary endpoint; secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), response duration (RD), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Due to poor recruitment, the trial was terminated after 100 of a pre-planned 430 patients. Patient characteristics were well balanced. No significant difference was observed in terms of TTP, ORR, RD and OS. Grade 3/4 adverse events encompassed leucopoenia (29 vs. 68%, P < 0.001), neutropoenia (49 vs. 83%, P < 0.001) and febrile neutropoenia (4 vs. 9%, n.s.), all favouring D → G. No difference in efficacy was observed between concomitant and sequential treatment. D → G produced significantly more episodes of haematological toxicity due to the administration of docetaxel at 100 mg/m2 without GCSF-support.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Docetaxel
KW - Gemcitabine
KW - Metastatic breast cancer
KW - Sequential versus concomitant
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72449208461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10549-009-0553-4
DO - 10.1007/s10549-009-0553-4
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:72449208461
SN - 0167-6806
VL - 119
SP - 169
EP - 176
JO - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
JF - Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
IS - 1
ER -