@inbook{a8be70b22f75433a917313af0dbd8d0c,
title = "Conclusion: The Rise of the Riddle of Bacon",
abstract = "It should be clear by now why the riddle of Bacon arose. Generations of researchers admired him for his theory, and this theory did not allow them to criticize this theory respectfully. So the individual Bacon was criticized to save his theory. Stubbe criticized his plagiarism and fake experiments. This criticism was ignored until Liebig repeated it with some bitterness. Here is Liebig{\textquoteright}s conclusion to his comment on Bacon{\textquoteright}s natural history (Liebig 1863, 244):.",
keywords = "Experimental Philosophy, False Answer, Late Seventeenth, Latin Language, Latin Text",
author = "Joseph Agassi",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2013, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-007-5351-8_9",
language = "אנגלית",
series = "Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
pages = "121--124",
booktitle = "Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science",
address = "ארצות הברית",
}