Computationally-effective worst-case model of wire radiation in the frequency range 1 Hz - 40 GHz

Y. Y. Arlou, E. V. Sinkevich, S. V. Maly, G. Ya Slepyan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

The worst-case model of a wire radiation field intended for the analysis of spurious couplings in complexes of radio and electronic equipment has been developed. The model is based on dividing the wire into straight-line segments and considering forward and backward current waves in each segment. The solution for each current wave is interpreted as interference of fields radiated by equivalent point sources, and the envelope of the amplitude-frequency characteristic is found in the area of resonances. The correctness of the model is checked in a wide range of problem parameters values: the length of the wire ranges from 0.1 m to 10 m, the height of the wire above the ground plane ranges from 0.1 mm to 1 m, and the observation point position is up to 10 m away from the center of the wire in arbitrary direction.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages1293-1298
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9781479932252
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Oct 2014
Event2014 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, EMC Europe 2014 - Gothenburg, Sweden
Duration: 1 Sep 20144 Sep 2014

Publication series

NameIEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility
ISSN (Print)1077-4076
ISSN (Electronic)2158-1118

Conference

Conference2014 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, EMC Europe 2014
Country/TerritorySweden
CityGothenburg
Period1/09/144/09/14

Keywords

  • envelope
  • frequency response
  • wire radiation
  • worst-case model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Computationally-effective worst-case model of wire radiation in the frequency range 1 Hz - 40 GHz'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this