Competing Values and Policy Choices: Israeli Public Opinion on Foreign and Security Affairs

Michal Shamir, Asher Arian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Value hierarchies structure people's position on specific issues when values are in conflict. This general proposition is tested using surveys of Israeli public opinion on issues relating to the Israeli-Arab conflict. Value priorities are shown to be politically and ideologically structured, and not random, with certain value combinations more prevalent and more enduring than others. Most importantly, we establish that people's value hierarchies significantly structure policy preferences and changes therein. The more salient or acute the value conflict, the greater the correspondence between hierarchy and preference. This value trade-off approach presents a picture of Israeli public opinion which is very different from that usually portrayed: of a population firmly supporting a Jewish majority in their state, with a very strong desire for peace. The values of land and democracy are shown to be much less important.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-271
Number of pages23
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1994

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Competing Values and Policy Choices: Israeli Public Opinion on Foreign and Security Affairs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this