Compensation neurosis rides again

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Compensation neurosis (CN), also known as accident neurosis, has generally not been considered to be a 'real' disorder. In 1961 it was seemingly laid to rest by Henry Miller, a distinguished neurologist, in a sharp article which appeared in the British Medical Journal. Miller's view of patients who presented psychological symptoms following accidents or traumas was suspicious. Compensated or not, his view seemed to be that they should have their legal process finished as quickly as possible and then they will miraculously convalesce. Miller's work, it appeared, was the coup de grace for this ill-defined diagnosis. Today, however, compensation neurosis seems to ride again. After a prolonged silence in the psychiatric literature, new papers are emerging, strongly suggesting that this vanishing diagnosis be reconsidered. This new trend will be presented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)401-410
Number of pages10
JournalBrain Injury
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Compensation neurosis rides again'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this