TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of two techniques for the evaluation of fetomaternal hemorrhage in RhD-negative women
T2 - Gel agglutination and haemoglobin F determination by flow cytometry
AU - Ben-Haroush, Avi
AU - Belkin, Alina
AU - Chezar, Judith
AU - Orlin, Jerome
AU - Hod, Moshe
AU - Bar, Jacob
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Background. In the treatment of RhD-negative women, it is clinically important to adjust the RhD immunoglobulin dose to the volume of the fetal-maternal hemorrhage (FMH). The present study compared a standard flow cytometry technique for FMH quantification to a simple alternative, the gel agglutination test. Methods. Blood samples were collected from 118 RhD negative women after delivery, and were analysed for the amount of FMH by both flow cytometry and the gel agglutination test. Events associated with increased FMH in a previous and current pregnancy, and with neonatal complications, were correlated to the results. Results. A FMH of 0.1 ml or more was detected in all 118 women in the study group by flow cytometry (mean 2.0±1.2 ml), but in only 31 women (35.6% of 87 with RhD positive infant) (mean FMH 0.76±1.48 ml) by the gel agglutination test (p<0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, only gestational age was a weak significant independent positive predictor for FMH (r 2=0.037, p=0.047). Conclusion. The gel agglutination technique, as used in the range of 0.1-10 ml, is not sensitive enough to detect FMH.
AB - Background. In the treatment of RhD-negative women, it is clinically important to adjust the RhD immunoglobulin dose to the volume of the fetal-maternal hemorrhage (FMH). The present study compared a standard flow cytometry technique for FMH quantification to a simple alternative, the gel agglutination test. Methods. Blood samples were collected from 118 RhD negative women after delivery, and were analysed for the amount of FMH by both flow cytometry and the gel agglutination test. Events associated with increased FMH in a previous and current pregnancy, and with neonatal complications, were correlated to the results. Results. A FMH of 0.1 ml or more was detected in all 118 women in the study group by flow cytometry (mean 2.0±1.2 ml), but in only 31 women (35.6% of 87 with RhD positive infant) (mean FMH 0.76±1.48 ml) by the gel agglutination test (p<0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, only gestational age was a weak significant independent positive predictor for FMH (r 2=0.037, p=0.047). Conclusion. The gel agglutination technique, as used in the range of 0.1-10 ml, is not sensitive enough to detect FMH.
KW - Fetomaternal hemorrhage
KW - Flow cytometry
KW - Gel agglutination
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447123803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00016340701415509
DO - 10.1080/00016340701415509
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:34447123803
SN - 0001-6349
VL - 86
SP - 821
EP - 826
JO - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
JF - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
IS - 7
ER -