TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Number of Calcified Coronary Plaques for Predicting Patient Mortality Risk
AU - Arnson, Yoav
AU - Rozanski, Alan
AU - Gransar, Heidi
AU - Friedman, John D.
AU - Hayes, Sean W.
AU - Thomson, Louise E.
AU - Tamarappoo, Balaji
AU - Slomka, Piotr
AU - Wang, Frances
AU - Germano, Guido
AU - Dey, Damini
AU - Berman, Daniel S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/12/15
Y1 - 2017/12/15
N2 - Multiple coronary artery calcium (CAC) parameters have recently been proposed to improve risk prediction in patients with intermediate clinical risk based on CAC scoring, but outcome data that assess these variables are relatively sparse. We analyzed data from 11,633 consecutive asymptomatic patients undergoing CAC scanning that were followed for 8.8 ± 3.5 years for all-cause mortality (ACM). The patients who had coronary artery calcification were grouped by the number of calcified coronary plaques: 0, 1 to 5, 6 to 20, and >20 plaques. We examined the independent prognostic value of plaque number and its synergistic prognostic value when added to the CAC score. We observed a stepwise increase in ACM with increasing plaque number. In patients with a CAC score of 1 to 99, 6 plaques or more were associated with increased mortality. In patients with CAC scores of 100 to 399, there was a stepwise increase in ACM with increasing plaque number. For CAC >400, the risk of ACM was high regardless of plaque number. After risk adjustment, the number of plaques was a significant predictor of risk for ACM in the patients with an intermediate CAC score. In these patients, additional consideration of plaque number improved net reclassification improvement for predicting ACM by 29%. In conclusion, the number of calcified plaques adds to risk stratification beyond the CAC score in patients with intermediate CAC scores.
AB - Multiple coronary artery calcium (CAC) parameters have recently been proposed to improve risk prediction in patients with intermediate clinical risk based on CAC scoring, but outcome data that assess these variables are relatively sparse. We analyzed data from 11,633 consecutive asymptomatic patients undergoing CAC scanning that were followed for 8.8 ± 3.5 years for all-cause mortality (ACM). The patients who had coronary artery calcification were grouped by the number of calcified coronary plaques: 0, 1 to 5, 6 to 20, and >20 plaques. We examined the independent prognostic value of plaque number and its synergistic prognostic value when added to the CAC score. We observed a stepwise increase in ACM with increasing plaque number. In patients with a CAC score of 1 to 99, 6 plaques or more were associated with increased mortality. In patients with CAC scores of 100 to 399, there was a stepwise increase in ACM with increasing plaque number. For CAC >400, the risk of ACM was high regardless of plaque number. After risk adjustment, the number of plaques was a significant predictor of risk for ACM in the patients with an intermediate CAC score. In these patients, additional consideration of plaque number improved net reclassification improvement for predicting ACM by 29%. In conclusion, the number of calcified plaques adds to risk stratification beyond the CAC score in patients with intermediate CAC scores.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032746705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.09.001
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 29096884
AN - SCOPUS:85032746705
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 120
SP - 2154
EP - 2159
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 12
ER -