Comparison of platelet inhibition by prasugrel versus ticagrelor over time in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Leor Perl, Noa Zemer-Wassercug, Eldad Rechavia, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Katia Orvin, Adaya Weissler-Snir, Hila Lerman-Shivek, Ran Kornowski, Eli I. Lev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) despite use of P2Y12 antagonists is associated with adverse cardiac events. The long-term variability in response to prasugrel and ticagrelor is unclear. Our aim was to assess residual platelet reactivity (PR) and rates of HTPR during treatment with prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). 114 patients with MI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included. Sixty-two patients were treated with prasugrel (mean age 58 ± 8 years, 21 % women, 29 % diabetes), and 52 patients with ticagrelor (mean age 63 ± 9, 19 % women, 37 % diabetes). Patients were tested for PR at 2–4 days and 30 days post-PCI, using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and the multiple-electrode aggregometry. Our results show a higher residual PR in patients treated with prasugrel than those treated with ticagrelor (VerifyNow: 65.4 ± 60.6 vs. 26.0 ± 24.2 P2Y12 reaction units, p < 0.001 at 2–4 days, and 67.3 ± 62.5 vs. 21.1 ± 26.1, p < 0.001 at follow-up). HTPR rates were higher in the prasugrel group (8.1–11.3 % vs. none with ticagrelor in the early test, and 8.7–10.9 % vs. none with ticagrelor at follow-up). In conclusion, in patients with MI undergoing PCI, treatment with ticagrelor resulted in greater platelet inhibition and lower HTPR rates compared with prasugrel, up to 30 days after the event.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2015


  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Platelet reactivity
  • Prasugrel
  • Ticagrelor


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of platelet inhibition by prasugrel versus ticagrelor over time in patients with acute myocardial infarction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this