Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes in multivessel coronary artery disease patients treated either with bioresoarbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent or permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 5-year results of the CENTURY II randomized clinical trial

  • on behalf of CENTURY II study investigators
  • University Hospital of Vigo
  • Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud
  • Segeberger Kliniken
  • University of Galway
  • CHU de Toulouse
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz
  • Cardiovascular Center Aalst
  • Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Nuova di Reggio Emilia
  • Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca
  • The Cardiovascular Institute
  • Shonan Kamakura General Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of a sirolimus-eluting stent with bioresorbable polymer (BP-SES; Ultimaster), in comparison to a benchmark everolimus-eluting, permanent polymer stent (PP-EES; Xience), in a prespecified subgroup of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) enrolled in the CENTURY II trial. Background: The use of coronary stenting in high-risk subgroups, like MVD patients, is rising. The clinical evidence, including long-term comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety benefits of different new-generation drug eluting stents, however, remains insufficient. Methods: Among 1,119 patients (intention-to-treat) enrolled in the CENTURY II prospective, randomized, single-blind, multicenter trial, a prespecified subgroup of 456 MVD patients were allocated by stratified randomization to treatment with BP-SES (n = 225) or PP-EES (n = 231). The previously reported primary endpoint of this study was freedom from target lesion failure (TLF: a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction [MI] and clinically-indicated target lesion revascularization) at 9 months. Results: In this MVD substudy, baseline patient, lesion and procedure characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. At 1 and 5 years, both BP-SES and PP-EES displayed low and comparable rates of TLF (5.3 vs. 7.8%; p =.29 and 10.2 vs. 13.4%; p =.29), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.4 vs. 1.3%; p =.33 and 0.9 vs. 1.7%; p =.43), respectively. Composite endpoint of cardiac death and MI, and patient-oriented composite endpoint of any death, MI, and coronary revascularizations were also similar. Conclusions: These results confirm good long-term safety and efficacy of the studied bioresorbable polymer stent in this high-risk patient population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-184
Number of pages10
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume95
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • clinical trials
  • complex PCI
  • coronary artery disease
  • drug eluting
  • percutaneous coronary intervention, stent
  • stent design/structure/coating

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes in multivessel coronary artery disease patients treated either with bioresoarbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent or permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 5-year results of the CENTURY II randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this