Comparison of ego defenses among physically abused children, neglected, and non-maltreated children

Ricky Finzi*, Dov Har-Even, Abraham Weizman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

The nature and level of ego functioning were assessed in 41 recently detected physically abused children, and in two control groups of 38 neglected and 35 non-abused/non-neglected children (aged 6 to 12 years), using the Child Suicidal Potential Scales (CSPS). The results obtained in this study support the hypothesis that the influences of parental violence on the child's ego functions are detrimental, as reflected by significantly higher impairments in affect regulation (like irritability, anger, passivity, depression), low levels of impulse control, distortions in reality testing, and extensive operation of immature defense mechanisms in the physically abused children in comparison to the controls. Significant differences between the physically abused and the non-abused/non-neglected children were found for all mechanisms except displacement. The differences between the physically abused and neglected children for regression, denial and splitting, projection, and introjection (high scores for the physically abused children), and for compensation and undoing (higher scores for the neglected children) were also significant. It is suggested that physically abused children should be distinguished as a high-risk population for future personality disorders.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)388-395
Number of pages8
JournalComprehensive Psychiatry
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of ego defenses among physically abused children, neglected, and non-maltreated children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this