Abstract
Background. This study examined the effect of measuring blood pressure below subjects' rolled-up sleeves, over the sleeve, or on the bare arm. This is an important day-to-day issue for the busy GP. Methods. The sample consisted of 201 subjects in family practice clinics and residents of a senior citizens' home. A digital device was used in all cases. Each participant underwent three blood pressure measurements in each of the following conditions in random order: cuff on bare arm; cuff over the sleeve; and cuff below the rolled-up sleeve. Differences between measurements were plotted against the mean blood pressure. Confounding factors controlled for were age, sex, clothing pressure and skin-fold thickness. Results. Differences in mean blood pressure readings between the clothed and bare arm were 0.5 mmHg (SD 7.5) for systolic pressure and 1 mmHg (SD 5) for diastolic pressure; neither difference was significant. However, in hypertensive subjects (>140 mmHg systolic), although the mean difference remained small (systolic pressure, 2 mmHg, SD 10), the range of difference for individual subjects was -32 mmHg to +22 mmHg. Conclusion. The degree of clothing under the sphygmomanometer cuff does not have a clinically important effect on the blood pressure measurement. In patients known or found to be hypertensive, measurement on the bare arm is recommended.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 730-732 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Family Practice |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2003 |
Keywords
- Blood pressure
- Blood pressure cuff
- Family medicine
- Measurements
- Screening
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of blood pressure measurements on the bare arm, below a rolled-up sleeve, or over a sleeve'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver