Comparison of adnexal torsion between pregnant and nonpregnant women

Joseph Hasson, Ziv Tsafrir, Foad Azem, Shikma Bar-On, Beni Almog, Roy Mashiach, Daniel Seidman, Joseph B. Lessing, Dan Grisaru*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

102 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical manifestations, treatment, and pregnancy outcome of adnexal torsion in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective case-control study in the Departments of Gynecology at 2 tertiary centers between 1999-2008. Forty-one pregnant and 77 nonpregnant women with surgically proved adnexal torsion were assessed. Results: Recurrence rate of torsion was 19.5% in pregnant women and 9.1% in control subjects; 73% of pregnant women conceived through assisted reproductive technologies. Doppler blood flow was falsely normal in 61% of pregnant women and in 45% of nonpregnant women; 83.3% of pregnant women delivered at term. Laparoscopic detorsion was the main surgical procedure. Conclusion: Presentation of adnexal torsion is similar in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Past assisted reproductive technology is an important risk factor in pregnancy. Doppler blood flow has a high false-negative rate and should not outweigh clinical suspicion. Although pregnancy outcome is favorable, the high rate of recurrence raises the issue of surgical fixation at the first episode.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)536.e1-536.e6
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume202
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • adnexal torsion
  • fixation
  • pregnancy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of adnexal torsion between pregnant and nonpregnant women'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this