TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison between Small and Large Bowel Intussusception in Children
T2 - The Experience of a Large Tertiary Care Pediatric Hospital
AU - Levinson, Hila
AU - Capua, Tali
AU - Scolnik, Dennis
AU - Rimon, Ayelet
AU - Salomon, Lotan
AU - Glatstein, Miguel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - Background Intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in young children, and delayed diagnosis may lead to serious sequelae. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of ileoileal intussusception and to document and compare clinical outcomes with ileocolic intussusception. Methods A retrospective cohort study of children with an abdominal ultrasound that diagnosed intussusception. Clinical data and diagnostic studies were retrieved, to compare ileoileal with ileocolic intussusception. Results A total of 488 patients were evaluated with an abdominal ultrasound on suspicion of intussusception; 54 (11%) had ileoileal intussusception and 30 (6%) ileocolic intussusception. The significant features distinguishing the 2 conditions were fever, more common in patients with ileoileal intussusception, and an abdominal mass, which was papable more commonly in ileocolic intussusception. None of the ileoileal intussusception patients required surgical intervention, and all were discharged without complication. Conclusions With recent advances in abdominal ultrasound, the diagnosis of ileoileal intussusception has become easier than before. Patients presenting with small bowel intussusception may not need any immediate intervention. The presence of fever supports the diagnosis of ileoileal intussusception.
AB - Background Intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in young children, and delayed diagnosis may lead to serious sequelae. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of ileoileal intussusception and to document and compare clinical outcomes with ileocolic intussusception. Methods A retrospective cohort study of children with an abdominal ultrasound that diagnosed intussusception. Clinical data and diagnostic studies were retrieved, to compare ileoileal with ileocolic intussusception. Results A total of 488 patients were evaluated with an abdominal ultrasound on suspicion of intussusception; 54 (11%) had ileoileal intussusception and 30 (6%) ileocolic intussusception. The significant features distinguishing the 2 conditions were fever, more common in patients with ileoileal intussusception, and an abdominal mass, which was papable more commonly in ileocolic intussusception. None of the ileoileal intussusception patients required surgical intervention, and all were discharged without complication. Conclusions With recent advances in abdominal ultrasound, the diagnosis of ileoileal intussusception has become easier than before. Patients presenting with small bowel intussusception may not need any immediate intervention. The presence of fever supports the diagnosis of ileoileal intussusception.
KW - ileocolic
KW - irritability
KW - small bowel intussusception
KW - ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082980246&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001393
DO - 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001393
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 29337838
AN - SCOPUS:85082980246
SN - 0749-5161
VL - 36
SP - E189-E191
JO - Pediatric Emergency Care
JF - Pediatric Emergency Care
IS - 4
ER -