TY - GEN
T1 - Comparing vision-based to sonar-based 3D reconstruction
AU - Frank, Netanel
AU - Wolf, Lior
AU - Olshansky, Danny
AU - Boonman, Arjan
AU - Yovel, Yossi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IEEE.
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Our understanding of sonar based sensing is very limited in comparison to light based imaging. In this work, we synthesize a ShapeNet variant in which echolocation replaces the role of vision. A new hypernetwork method is presented for 3D reconstruction from a single echolocation view. The success of the method demonstrates the ability to reconstruct a 3D shape from bat-like sonar, and not just obtain the relative position of the bat with respect to obstacles. In addition, it is shown that integrating information from multiple orientations around the same view point helps performance. The sonar-based method we develop is analog to the state-of-the-art single image reconstruction method, which allows us to directly compare the two imaging modalities. Based on this analysis, we learn that while 3D can be reliably reconstructed form sonar, as far as the current technology shows, the accuracy is lower than the one obtained based on vision, that the performance in sonar and in vision are highly correlated, that both modalities favor shapes that are not round, and that while the current vision method is able to better reconstruct the 3D shape, its advantage with respect to estimating the normal's direction is much lower.
AB - Our understanding of sonar based sensing is very limited in comparison to light based imaging. In this work, we synthesize a ShapeNet variant in which echolocation replaces the role of vision. A new hypernetwork method is presented for 3D reconstruction from a single echolocation view. The success of the method demonstrates the ability to reconstruct a 3D shape from bat-like sonar, and not just obtain the relative position of the bat with respect to obstacles. In addition, it is shown that integrating information from multiple orientations around the same view point helps performance. The sonar-based method we develop is analog to the state-of-the-art single image reconstruction method, which allows us to directly compare the two imaging modalities. Based on this analysis, we learn that while 3D can be reliably reconstructed form sonar, as far as the current technology shows, the accuracy is lower than the one obtained based on vision, that the performance in sonar and in vision are highly correlated, that both modalities favor shapes that are not round, and that while the current vision method is able to better reconstruct the 3D shape, its advantage with respect to estimating the normal's direction is much lower.
KW - 3D reconstruction
KW - Hypernetworks
KW - Sonar imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086629529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICCP48838.2020.9105273
DO - 10.1109/ICCP48838.2020.9105273
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???
AN - SCOPUS:85086629529
T3 - IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography, ICCP 2020
BT - IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography, ICCP 2020
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 24 April 2020 through 26 April 2020
ER -