Comparative study for preoperative staging of rectal cancer

A. Waizer*, S. Zitron, D. Ben-Baruch, J. Baniel, Y. Wolloch, M. Dintsman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

A comparative study of preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer is presented. Sixty-eight patients with rectal cancer were examined digitally and by computerized tomography and transrectal ultrasound. Preoperative staging was compared with pathologic findings at surgery. Digital examination and transrectal ultrasound were accurate in 82.8 and 76.2 percent, respectively and were superior to CT, which was accurate in 65.5 percent of cases for assessment of rectal wall invasion. All three modes play a role in preoperative assessment, but digital examination and rectal ultrasound appear to be more effective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-56
Number of pages4
JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1989
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Retal cancer
  • Staging
  • Transrectal ultrasound

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative study for preoperative staging of rectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this