Comment on 'Two-state vector formalism and quantum interference'

L. Vaidman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hashmi et al (2016 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49 345302) claimed that the approach to the past of a quantum particle introduced by Vaidman (2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 052104) has difficulties in certain examples and that it can even be refuted. Here I reply to their criticism showing that the approach provides a good explanation for all the examples they considered. It is fully consistent with standard quantum mechanics and provides a useful tool for analyzing interference experiments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number068002
JournalJournal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
Volume51
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 Jan 2018

Funding

FundersFunder number
German–Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and DevelopmentI-1275-303.14
Israel Science Foundation1311/14

    Keywords

    • nested interferometer
    • past of a particle
    • two-state vector formalism
    • weak measurements

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on 'Two-state vector formalism and quantum interference''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this