TY - JOUR
T1 - Comment on "spin-orbit interaction and spin selectivity for tunneling electron transfer in DNA"
AU - Entin-Wohlman, Ora
AU - Aharony, Amnon
AU - Utsumi, Yasuhiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Physical Society.
PY - 2021/2/22
Y1 - 2021/2/22
N2 - The observation of chiral-induced spin selectivity (CISS) in biological molecules still awaits a full theoretical explanation. In a recent Rapid Communication, Varela et al. [Phys. Rev. B 101, 241410(R) (2020)2469-995010.1103/PhysRevB.101.241410] presented a model for electron transport in biological molecules by tunneling in the presence of spin-orbit interactions. They then claimed that their model produces a strong spin asymmetry due to the intrinsic atomic spin-orbit strength. As their Hamiltonian is time-reversal symmetric, this result contradicts a theorem by Bardarson [J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 405203 (2008)1751-811310.1088/1751-8113/41/40/405203], which states that such a Hamiltonian cannot generate a spin asymmetry for tunneling between two terminals (in which there are only a spin-up and a spin-down channel). Here we solve the model proposed by Varela et al. and show that it does not yield any spin asymmetry, and therefore cannot explain the observed CISS effect.
AB - The observation of chiral-induced spin selectivity (CISS) in biological molecules still awaits a full theoretical explanation. In a recent Rapid Communication, Varela et al. [Phys. Rev. B 101, 241410(R) (2020)2469-995010.1103/PhysRevB.101.241410] presented a model for electron transport in biological molecules by tunneling in the presence of spin-orbit interactions. They then claimed that their model produces a strong spin asymmetry due to the intrinsic atomic spin-orbit strength. As their Hamiltonian is time-reversal symmetric, this result contradicts a theorem by Bardarson [J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 405203 (2008)1751-811310.1088/1751-8113/41/40/405203], which states that such a Hamiltonian cannot generate a spin asymmetry for tunneling between two terminals (in which there are only a spin-up and a spin-down channel). Here we solve the model proposed by Varela et al. and show that it does not yield any spin asymmetry, and therefore cannot explain the observed CISS effect.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101943063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.077401
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.077401
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85101943063
SN - 2469-9950
VL - 103
JO - Physical Review B
JF - Physical Review B
IS - 7
M1 - 077401
ER -