Comment on "Particle path through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer"

L. Vaidman

doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.95.066101

Comment on "Particle path through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer"

L. Vaidman^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

School of Physics and Astronomy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Griffiths [Phys. Rev. A 94, 032115 (2016)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.94.032115] analyzed, in the framework of a consistent histories interpretation, the controversy regarding the approach to the past of a quantum particle introduced by Vaidman [Phys. Rev. A 87, 052104 (2013)PLRAAN1050-294710.1103/PhysRevA.87.052104]. I argue that Griffith's criticism of my approach using an analysis of experiments with weak probes is unfounded.

Original language	English
Article number	066101
Journal	Physical Review A
Volume	95
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.066101
State	Published - 28 Jun 2017

Funding

Funders	Funder number
German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development	I-1275-303.14
Israel Science Foundation	1311/14

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevA.95.066101

Cite this

@article{537561d6fc90425183a6051ec73bb67f,

title = "Comment on {"}Particle path through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer{"}",

abstract = "Griffiths [Phys. Rev. A 94, 032115 (2016)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.94.032115] analyzed, in the framework of a consistent histories interpretation, the controversy regarding the approach to the past of a quantum particle introduced by Vaidman [Phys. Rev. A 87, 052104 (2013)PLRAAN1050-294710.1103/PhysRevA.87.052104]. I argue that Griffith's criticism of my approach using an analysis of experiments with weak probes is unfounded.",

author = "L. Vaidman",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 American Physical Society.",

year = "2017",

month = jun,

day = "28",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevA.95.066101",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "95",

journal = "Physical Review A",

issn = "2469-9926",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on "Particle path through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer"

AU - Vaidman, L.

PY - 2017/6/28

Y1 - 2017/6/28

N2 - Griffiths [Phys. Rev. A 94, 032115 (2016)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.94.032115] analyzed, in the framework of a consistent histories interpretation, the controversy regarding the approach to the past of a quantum particle introduced by Vaidman [Phys. Rev. A 87, 052104 (2013)PLRAAN1050-294710.1103/PhysRevA.87.052104]. I argue that Griffith's criticism of my approach using an analysis of experiments with weak probes is unfounded.

AB - Griffiths [Phys. Rev. A 94, 032115 (2016)2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.94.032115] analyzed, in the framework of a consistent histories interpretation, the controversy regarding the approach to the past of a quantum particle introduced by Vaidman [Phys. Rev. A 87, 052104 (2013)PLRAAN1050-294710.1103/PhysRevA.87.052104]. I argue that Griffith's criticism of my approach using an analysis of experiments with weak probes is unfounded.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027064373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.066101

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.066101

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???

AN - SCOPUS:85027064373

SN - 2469-9926

VL - 95

JO - Physical Review A

JF - Physical Review A

IS - 6

M1 - 066101

ER -

Comment on "Particle path through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer"

Abstract

Funding

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this