Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Combined pre-incisional oral dextromethorphan and epidural lidocaine for postoperative pain reduction and morphine sparing: A randomised double-blind study on day-surgery patients

  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
  • Rabin Campus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

The reduction in acute pain perception following dextromethorphan has previously been investigated in patients undergoing general anaesthesia. This random and double-blind study examined the effects of pre-incisional oral dextromethorphan on postoperative pain and intravenous patient-controlled morphine demand in 60 day-surgery patients undergoing lower body surgery under lidocaine (1.6%-16 ml) epidural anaesthesia after receiving placebo, 60 or 90 mg dextromethorphan, 90 min pre-operatively. Postoperative pain was scored on a visual analogue scale from 1 to 10. In-hospital observation continued for 6 h and for 3 days at home; diclofenac was available throughout. Dextromethorphan-treated patients reported significantly (p < 0.05) less pain and sedation, and felt better. Patients who received dextromethorphan 90 mg had significantly (p < 0.05) lower heart and respiratory rates than those who received 60 mg. Medicated patients required half the morphine and diclofenac of placebo patients: 38% of patients who received 90 mg and 21% who received dextromethorphan 60 mg used no morphine or diclofenac whatsoever, a previously unreported finding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)616-622
Number of pages7
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume56
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anaesthetic technique: epidural
  • Anaesthetics, local: lidocaine
  • Analgesics: morphine
  • Pain: postoperative
  • Pharmacology: dextromethorphan

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Combined pre-incisional oral dextromethorphan and epidural lidocaine for postoperative pain reduction and morphine sparing: A randomised double-blind study on day-surgery patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this