TY - JOUR
T1 - Combined first trimester nuchal translucency and second trimester biochemical screening tests among normal pregnancies
AU - Herman, A.
AU - Weinraub, Z.
AU - Dreazen, E.
AU - Arieli, S.
AU - Rozansky, S.
AU - Bukovsky, I.
AU - Maymon, R.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - We prospectively examined whether first trimester nuchal translucency (NT) and second trimester triple test (TT) results are correlated, and determined overlapping and mutual screen-positive rates. Results of NT, TT, amniocentesis and pregnancy outcome were obtained in 508 normal pregnancies. Inter-test correlation was performed by comparing the likelihood ratios (LR). Overlapping of screen-positive cases, of NT and TT, was determined by comparing mutual risks for Down syndrome (DS) livebirth of ≤ 1: 380. Combined screen-positive rates were evaluated by using summation risk (NT and/or TT exhibiting a risk ≤ 1: 380) and calculated risk (new risk ≤ 1: 380, based on multiplication of LR(N)(T) and LR(T)(T). Screen-positive rates between NT and TT differed significantly and when either test showed an increased risk for DS, the probability of the other to predict the same was negligible (p < 0.001). Overall screen-positive rates, at a risk ≤ 1: 380, were 2% and 5.7% for NT and TT, respectively. Summation and calculated combining methods were associated with 7.5% and 2.0% screen-positive rates, respectively. Amniocentesis was performed on 20.7% of the cases, mostly screen-negative ones. Our results showed that, in normal pregnancies, NT and TT do not correlate and that their combined calculated risk in normal pregnancies is associated with a low screen-positive rate of 2.0%. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
AB - We prospectively examined whether first trimester nuchal translucency (NT) and second trimester triple test (TT) results are correlated, and determined overlapping and mutual screen-positive rates. Results of NT, TT, amniocentesis and pregnancy outcome were obtained in 508 normal pregnancies. Inter-test correlation was performed by comparing the likelihood ratios (LR). Overlapping of screen-positive cases, of NT and TT, was determined by comparing mutual risks for Down syndrome (DS) livebirth of ≤ 1: 380. Combined screen-positive rates were evaluated by using summation risk (NT and/or TT exhibiting a risk ≤ 1: 380) and calculated risk (new risk ≤ 1: 380, based on multiplication of LR(N)(T) and LR(T)(T). Screen-positive rates between NT and TT differed significantly and when either test showed an increased risk for DS, the probability of the other to predict the same was negligible (p < 0.001). Overall screen-positive rates, at a risk ≤ 1: 380, were 2% and 5.7% for NT and TT, respectively. Summation and calculated combining methods were associated with 7.5% and 2.0% screen-positive rates, respectively. Amniocentesis was performed on 20.7% of the cases, mostly screen-negative ones. Our results showed that, in normal pregnancies, NT and TT do not correlate and that their combined calculated risk in normal pregnancies is associated with a low screen-positive rate of 2.0%. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
KW - Combined risk
KW - Down syndrome
KW - Nuchal translucency
KW - Screen-positive rate
KW - Triple test
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033752266&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/1097-0223(200010)20:10<781::AID-PD908>3.0.CO;2-Z
DO - 10.1002/1097-0223(200010)20:10<781::AID-PD908>3.0.CO;2-Z
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0033752266
SN - 0197-3851
VL - 20
SP - 781
EP - 784
JO - Prenatal Diagnosis
JF - Prenatal Diagnosis
IS - 10
ER -