TY - GEN
T1 - Combinatorial walrasian equilibrium
AU - Feldman, Michal
AU - Gravin, Nick
AU - Lucier, Brendan
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - We study a combinatorial market design problem, where a collection of indivisible objects is to be priced and sold to potential buyers subject to equilibrium constraints. The classic solution concept for such problems isWalrasian Equilibrium (WE), which provides a simple and transparent pricing structure that achieves optimal social welfare. The main weakness of the WE notion is that it exists only in very restrictive cases. To overcome this limitation, we introduce the notion of a Combinatorial Walrasian equilibium (CWE), a natural relaxation of WE. The difference between a CWE and a (non-combinatorial) WE is that the seller can package the items into indivisible bundles prior to sale, and the market does not necessarily clear. We show that every valuation profile admits a CWE that obtains at least half of the optimal (unconstrained) social welfare. Moreover, we devise a poly-time algorithm that, given an arbitrary allocation X, computes a CWE that achieves at least half of the welfare of X. Thus, the economic problem of finding a CWE with high social welfare reduces to the algorithmic problem of social-welfare approximation. In addition, we show that every valuation profile admits a CWE that extracts a logarithmic fraction of the optimal welfare as revenue. Finally, these results are complemented by strong lower bounds when the seller is restricted to using item prices only, which motivates the use of bundles. The strength of our results derives partly from their generality - our results hold for arbitrary valuations that may exhibit complex combinations of substitutes and complements.
AB - We study a combinatorial market design problem, where a collection of indivisible objects is to be priced and sold to potential buyers subject to equilibrium constraints. The classic solution concept for such problems isWalrasian Equilibrium (WE), which provides a simple and transparent pricing structure that achieves optimal social welfare. The main weakness of the WE notion is that it exists only in very restrictive cases. To overcome this limitation, we introduce the notion of a Combinatorial Walrasian equilibium (CWE), a natural relaxation of WE. The difference between a CWE and a (non-combinatorial) WE is that the seller can package the items into indivisible bundles prior to sale, and the market does not necessarily clear. We show that every valuation profile admits a CWE that obtains at least half of the optimal (unconstrained) social welfare. Moreover, we devise a poly-time algorithm that, given an arbitrary allocation X, computes a CWE that achieves at least half of the welfare of X. Thus, the economic problem of finding a CWE with high social welfare reduces to the algorithmic problem of social-welfare approximation. In addition, we show that every valuation profile admits a CWE that extracts a logarithmic fraction of the optimal welfare as revenue. Finally, these results are complemented by strong lower bounds when the seller is restricted to using item prices only, which motivates the use of bundles. The strength of our results derives partly from their generality - our results hold for arbitrary valuations that may exhibit complex combinations of substitutes and complements.
KW - Combinatorial auctions
KW - Envy-free
KW - Walrasian equilibrium
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879836009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2488608.2488617
DO - 10.1145/2488608.2488617
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???
AN - SCOPUS:84879836009
SN - 9781450320290
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
SP - 61
EP - 70
BT - STOC 2013 - Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
T2 - 45th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2013
Y2 - 1 June 2013 through 4 June 2013
ER -