Cognition and emotion lecture at the 2010 SPSP emotion preconference: Emotion generation and emotion regulation: A distinction we should make (Carefully)

James J. Gross, Gal Sheppes, Heather L. Urry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

231 Scopus citations

Abstract

One of the most fundamental distinctions in the field of emotion is the distinction between emotion generation and emotion regulation. This distinction fits comfortably with folk theories, which view emotions as passions that arise unbidden and then must be controlled. But is it really helpful to distinguish between emotion generation and emotion regulation? In this article, we begin by offering working definitions of emotion generation and emotion regulation. We argue that in some circumstances, the distinction between emotion generation and emotion regulation is indeed useful. We point both to citation patterns, which indicate that researchers from across a number of sub-areas within psychology are making this distinction, and to empirical studies, which indicate the utility of this distinction in many different research contexts. We then consider five ways in which the distinction between emotion generation and emotion regulation can be problematic. We suggest that it is time to move beyond debates about whether this distinction is useful to a more specific consideration of when and in what ways this distinction is useful, and in this spirit, we offer recommendations for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)765-781
Number of pages17
JournalCognition and Emotion
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Emotion generation
  • Emotion regulation
  • Review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cognition and emotion lecture at the 2010 SPSP emotion preconference: Emotion generation and emotion regulation: A distinction we should make (Carefully)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this