Coercion and Volition in Law and Philosophy

Amit Pundik*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper discusses cases in which defendants were coerced to do something they wanted to do anyway. Through these cases a stark divergence between the legal and philosophical discussion of alternative possibilities is highlighted. The paper seeks to vindicate the legal approach to coercion and volition by showing that the legal approach could be accounted for with an epistemic version of the Principle of Alternative Possibilities, a version which is also immune to Frankfurt-type examples.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-123
Number of pages17
JournalCanadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coercion and Volition in Law and Philosophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this