Closed-loop glucose control in young people with type 1 diabetes during and after unannounced physical activity: a randomised controlled crossover trial

Klemen Dovc, Maddalena Macedoni, Natasa Bratina, Dusanka Lepej, Revital Nimri, Eran Atlas, Ido Muller, Olga Kordonouri, Torben Biester, Thomas Danne, Moshe Phillip, Tadej Battelino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Hypoglycaemia during and after exercise remains a challenge. The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of closed-loop insulin delivery during unannounced (to the closed-loop algorithm) afternoon physical activity and during the following night in young people with type 1 diabetes. Methods: A randomised, two-arm, open-label, in-hospital, crossover clinical trial was performed at a single site in Slovenia. The order was randomly determined using an automated web-based programme with randomly permuted blocks of four. Allocation assignment was not masked. Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes who were experienced insulin pump users were eligible for the trial. During four separate in-hospital visits, the participants performed two unannounced exercise protocols: moderate intensity (55% of V⋅ O 2 max) and moderate intensity with integrated high-intensity sprints (55/80% of V⋅ O 2 max), using the same study device either for closed-loop or open-loop insulin delivery. We investigated glycaemic control during the exercise period and the following night. The closed-loop insulin delivery was applied from 15:00 h on the day of the exercise to 13:00 h on the following day. Results: Between 20 January and 16 June 2016, 20 eligible participants (9 female, mean age 14.2 ± 2.0 years, HbA1c 7.7 ± 0.6% [60.0 ± 6.6 mmol/mol]) were included in the trial and performed all trial-mandated activities. The median proportion of time spent in hypoglycaemia below 3.3 mmol/l was 0.00% for both treatment modalities (p = 0.7910). Use of the closed-loop insulin delivery system increased the proportion of time spent within the target glucose range of 3.9–10 mmol/l when compared with open-loop delivery: 84.1% (interquartile range 70.0–85.5) vs 68.7% (59.0–77.7), respectively (p = 0.0057), over the entire study period. This was achieved with significantly less insulin delivered via the closed-loop (p = 0.0123). Conclusions/interpretation: Closed-loop insulin delivery was safe both during and after unannounced exercise protocols in the in-hospital environment, maintaining glucose values mostly within the target range without an increased risk of hypoglycaemia. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02657083 Funding: University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenian National Research Agency, and ISPAD Research Fellowship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2157-2167
Number of pages11
JournalDiabetologia
Volume60
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2017

Keywords

  • Clinical science
  • Devices
  • Diabetes in childhood
  • Exercise
  • Hypoglycaemia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Closed-loop glucose control in young people with type 1 diabetes during and after unannounced physical activity: a randomised controlled crossover trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this