TY - JOUR
T1 - CLL-106 First Prospective Data on Minimal Residual Disease Outcomes After Fixed-Duration Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax Versus Chlorambucil Plus Obinutuzumab for First-Line Treatment of CLL in Older Adult or Unfit Patients
T2 - The GLOW Study
AU - Munir, Talha
AU - Moreno, Carol
AU - Owen, Carolyn
AU - Follows, George
AU - Benjamini, Ohad
AU - Janssens, Ann
AU - Levin, Mark David
AU - Osterborg, Anders
AU - Robak, Tadeusz
AU - Simkovic, Martin
AU - Stevens, Don
AU - Voloshin, Sergey
AU - Vorobyev, Vladimir
AU - Yagci, Munci
AU - Ysebaert, Loic
AU - Qi, Qianya
AU - Steele, Andrew
AU - Schuier, Natasha
AU - Baeten, Kurt
AU - Caces, Donne Bennett
AU - Niemann, Carsten
AU - Kater, Arnon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Context: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a predictive marker for progression-free survival (PFS) in chronic leukocytic leukemia (CLL) following chemoimmunotherapy and fixed-duration treatment with venetoclax and anti-CD20 antibodies. This has not been explored for ibrutinib+venetoclax (Ibr+Ven), a fixed-duration treatment with mechanisms of action that synergistically eliminate CLL subpopulations in distinct tumor compartments. Objective: Investigate MRD outcomes at primary analysis of phase 3 GLOW study (NCT03462719). Design: Randomized, open-label, active-control study. Patients: Patients aged ≥65 years or 18–64 years with a CIRS score >6 or creatinine clearance <70 mL/min were randomized 1:1, stratified by IGHV mutational and del11q status, to Ibr+Ven (n=106) or chlorambucil+obinutuzumab (Clb+O) (n=105). Excluded: patients with del17p or known TP53 mutations. Interventions: Ibr+Ven (3 cycles of ibrutinib lead-in, then 12 cycles of Ibr+Ven) or 6 cycles of Clb+O. Main Outcome Measures: Primary endpoint: independent review committee–assessed PFS; secondary endpoint: rate of undetectable MRD (uMRD; <10–4); exploratory endpoints: MRD analyses. MRD results are by next-generation sequencing, reported 3 months after end of treatment (EOT+3) unless otherwise noted. Results: Rates of uMRD<10–4 were higher for Ibr+Ven versus Clb+O in bone marrow (BM) (51.9% vs. 17.1%; P<0.0001) and peripheral blood (PB) (54.7% vs. 39.0%; P=0.0259). For Ibr+Ven, BM uMRD was higher for uIGHV (58.2%) versus mutated IGHV (44.4%). With Ibr+Ven, 84.5% (49/58) of patients maintained PB uMRD from EOT+3 to EOT+12 versus 29.3% (12/41) with Clb+O. Rates of uMRD<10–5 were higher for Ibr+Ven versus Clb+O in BM (40.6% vs. 7.6%), including patients with uIGHV (45.5% vs. 5.6%). uMRD<10–5 in PB was largely sustained from EOT+3 to EOT+12 with Ibr+Ven (80.4% [37/46]) but not Clb+O (26.3% [5/19]). PFS rates for Ibr+Ven during the 12 months after EOT were >90% for patients with uMRD<10–4 and patients with detectable MRD; however, Clb+O arm patients with detectable PB MRD relapsed more quickly than those with uMRD<10–4. Conclusions: All-oral, once-daily, fixed-duration Ibr+Ven demonstrated superior uMRD responses that were deeper and better sustained post-treatment versus Clb+O in older adult or unfit patients with previously untreated CLL.
AB - Context: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a predictive marker for progression-free survival (PFS) in chronic leukocytic leukemia (CLL) following chemoimmunotherapy and fixed-duration treatment with venetoclax and anti-CD20 antibodies. This has not been explored for ibrutinib+venetoclax (Ibr+Ven), a fixed-duration treatment with mechanisms of action that synergistically eliminate CLL subpopulations in distinct tumor compartments. Objective: Investigate MRD outcomes at primary analysis of phase 3 GLOW study (NCT03462719). Design: Randomized, open-label, active-control study. Patients: Patients aged ≥65 years or 18–64 years with a CIRS score >6 or creatinine clearance <70 mL/min were randomized 1:1, stratified by IGHV mutational and del11q status, to Ibr+Ven (n=106) or chlorambucil+obinutuzumab (Clb+O) (n=105). Excluded: patients with del17p or known TP53 mutations. Interventions: Ibr+Ven (3 cycles of ibrutinib lead-in, then 12 cycles of Ibr+Ven) or 6 cycles of Clb+O. Main Outcome Measures: Primary endpoint: independent review committee–assessed PFS; secondary endpoint: rate of undetectable MRD (uMRD; <10–4); exploratory endpoints: MRD analyses. MRD results are by next-generation sequencing, reported 3 months after end of treatment (EOT+3) unless otherwise noted. Results: Rates of uMRD<10–4 were higher for Ibr+Ven versus Clb+O in bone marrow (BM) (51.9% vs. 17.1%; P<0.0001) and peripheral blood (PB) (54.7% vs. 39.0%; P=0.0259). For Ibr+Ven, BM uMRD was higher for uIGHV (58.2%) versus mutated IGHV (44.4%). With Ibr+Ven, 84.5% (49/58) of patients maintained PB uMRD from EOT+3 to EOT+12 versus 29.3% (12/41) with Clb+O. Rates of uMRD<10–5 were higher for Ibr+Ven versus Clb+O in BM (40.6% vs. 7.6%), including patients with uIGHV (45.5% vs. 5.6%). uMRD<10–5 in PB was largely sustained from EOT+3 to EOT+12 with Ibr+Ven (80.4% [37/46]) but not Clb+O (26.3% [5/19]). PFS rates for Ibr+Ven during the 12 months after EOT were >90% for patients with uMRD<10–4 and patients with detectable MRD; however, Clb+O arm patients with detectable PB MRD relapsed more quickly than those with uMRD<10–4. Conclusions: All-oral, once-daily, fixed-duration Ibr+Ven demonstrated superior uMRD responses that were deeper and better sustained post-treatment versus Clb+O in older adult or unfit patients with previously untreated CLL.
KW - CLL
KW - GLOW
KW - MRD
KW - Phase III
KW - chronic lymphocytic leukemia
KW - fixed-duration
KW - ibrutinib
KW - minimal residual disease
KW - venetoclax
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138138621&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2152-2650(22)01322-2
DO - 10.1016/S2152-2650(22)01322-2
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85138138621
SN - 2152-2650
VL - 22
SP - S264-S265
JO - Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
JF - Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
ER -