Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical utility and prospective of TMS–EEG: Updated review from an international expert group

  • Ulf Ziemann*
  • , Yang Bai
  • , Fiona M. Baumer
  • , Mikkel M. Beck
  • , Paolo Belardinelli
  • , Daniele Belvisi
  • , Stephan Bender
  • , Til Ole Bergmann
  • , Marta Bortoletto
  • , Silvia Casarotto
  • , Elias Casula
  • , Arthur R. Chaves
  • , Daniel Ciampi de Andrade
  • , Antonella Conte
  • , Zafiris J. Daskalakis
  • , Faranak Farzan
  • , Fabio Ferrarelli
  • , Paul B. Fitzgerald
  • , Pedro C. Gordon
  • , Christian Grefkes
  • Sylvain Harquel, Julio C. Hernandez-Pavon, Aron T. Hill, Kate E. Hoy, Friedhelm C. Hummel, Petro Julkunen, Elisa Kallioniemi, Corey J. Keller, Vasilios K. Kimiskidis, Melissa Kirkovski, Giacomo Koch, Giorgio Leodori, Pantelis Lioumis, Sara Määttä, Inbal Maidan, Marcello Massimini, Annerose Mengel, Johanna Metsomaa, Carlo Miniussi, Tuomas P. Mutanen, Yoshihiro Noda, Recep A. Ozdemir, Estelle Raffin, Lorenzo Rocchi, Nigel C. Rogasch, Mario Rosanova, Emiliano Santarnecchi, Simone Sarasso, Siobhan M. Schabrun, Mouhsin M. Shafi, Hartwig R. Siebner, Else A. Tolner, Leo Tomasevic, Sara Tremblay, Caroline Tscherpel, Domenica Veniero, Viviana Versace, Daphne Voineskos, Steve Vucic, Abraham Zangen, Christoph Zrenner, Risto J. Ilmoniemi
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Tübingen
  • Nanchang University
  • Rehabilitation Medicine Clinical Research Center of Jiangxi Province
  • Stanford University
  • University of Copenhagen
  • University of Trento
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed - Pozzilli (IS)
  • University of Cologne
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
  • Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung (LIR)
  • IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca
  • University of Milan
  • IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi - Milano
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata
  • IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia - Roma
  • The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research
  • University of Ottawa
  • Aalborg University
  • University of California at San Diego
  • Simon Fraser University
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Australian National University
  • Monarch Research Institute
  • Goethe University Frankfurt
  • Université Grenoble Alpes
  • Kansas State University
  • Deakin University
  • The Bionics Institute
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne
  • Clinique Romande de Réadaptation
  • University of Geneva
  • University of Eastern Finland
  • New Jersey Institute of Technology
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • AHEPA University Hospital
  • University of Ferrara
  • Aalto University
  • University of Helsinki
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
  • Keio University
  • Shinjuku-Yoyogi Mental Lab Clinic
  • International University of Health and Welfare
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Harvard University
  • University of Cagliari
  • Monash University
  • Adelaide University
  • South Australian Health And Medical Research Institute
  • Parkwood Institute
  • Western University
  • Leiden University
  • University of Regensburg
  • Universität der Bundeswehr München
  • Université du Québec en Outaouais
  • Carleton University
  • University of Nottingham
  • Hospital of Vipiteno (SABES-ASDAA)
  • University Health Network
  • The University of Sydney
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive technique to stimulate the brain, while electroencephalography (EEG) is a non-invasive technique to record its electrical activity. Their combined use (TMS–EEG) has been established only relatively recently, after successful development of TMS-compatible EEG amplifiers. TMS-EEG offers the unparalleled opportunity to directly perturb the brain with TMS and simultaneously record its response with EEG. This allows inferences on causal input–output relationships, therefore going critically beyond purely observational techniques, such as resting-state EEG or functional MRI, in the study of brain dynamics. This consensus review updates the work of Tremblay and coworkers [Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130: 802–844]. Since then, substantial advances have been made in understanding contamination of TMS–EEG signals by physiological and non-physiological artifacts, as well as in developing strategies to avoid or control them. In parallel, new insights have emerged regarding the physiological mechanisms underlying TMS-EEG responses and their diagnostic and prognostic utility in a broad range of psychiatric and neurological disorders. As such, TMS-EEG is rapidly shaping a dynamic new field in clinical neurophysiology and neuroscience. This review provides a critical and comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge, including practical guidance for implementing TMS-EEG in the clinical setting.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2111487
JournalClinical Neurophysiology
Volume184
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2026

Funding

FundersFunder number
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
REMED Co., Ltd.
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Teijin Pharma
Lundbeck Foundation
Ontario Research Foundation
National Institute of Mental Health
University of Toronto
WuTsai Neuroscience Institute
Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute
Watanabe Foundation
O'Farrel-Principe family
REMED Co. Ltd.
European Commission
Inter Reha
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Temerty Family Foundation
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
HORIZON Doctoral Network
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
European Research Council
Novo Nordisk Fonden
Ontario Brain Institute
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Agence Nationale de la RechercheANR-25-CE37-2363
Australian Research CouncilFT210100694
O’Farrel-Principe familyCRC 1451
National Recovery and Resilience PlanIR00011
Innovationsfonden9068-00025B
Israel Science Foundation2278/22
Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala5041742, 5041830
Michael Smith Health Research BC17727
Marga und Walter Boll-Stiftung1188607, 468645090
Santé309921
Epilepsiefonds2022-10
EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research10510062210003
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeK23NS116110
Canada Foundation for Innovation43911
National Institutes of HealthR01MH132074, R01MH126639, R01MH139650, K12TR004788
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme810377
Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftZI 542/13-1, 456732630, RTG 2783, 431549029 – SFB 1451, C05
ADAPT-PDR336-2020-1035
National Health and Medical Research Council1193596
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRGPIN-2015-05783
ZonMw114025101
EU101087925
Brain and Behavior Research Foundation31954
Canadian Institutes of Health Research165863
Burroughs Wellcome FundERC-2022-SYG - 101071900
National Institute on AgingP01AG031720
Universitätsklinikum Jena101059369, 24K10740, ME 5820/4-1, 21H02813, 20222ZLPFC
National Natural Science Foundation of China82472605, 82560454

    Keywords

    • Cortical excitability
    • Effective connectivity
    • Electroencephalography
    • TMS-EEG
    • Transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical utility and prospective of TMS–EEG: Updated review from an international expert group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this