TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients younger than 70 years rejected for surgery
T2 - the AMTRAC registry
AU - Witberg, Guy
AU - Landes, Uri
AU - Codner, Pablo
AU - Barbanti, Marco
AU - Valvo, Roberto
AU - De Backer, Ole
AU - Ooms, Joris F.
AU - McInerney, Angela
AU - Masiero, Giulia
AU - Werner, Paul
AU - Armario, Xavier
AU - Fiorina, Claudia
AU - Arzamendi, Dabit
AU - Santos-Martinez, Sandra
AU - Baz, Jose A.
AU - Steblovnik, Klemen
AU - Mauri, Victor
AU - Adam, Matti
AU - Merdler, Ilan
AU - Hein, Manuel
AU - Ruile, Philipp
AU - Russo, Marco
AU - Musumeci, Francesco
AU - Sedaghat, Alexander
AU - Sugiura, Atsushi
AU - Grasso, Carmelo
AU - Branca, Luca
AU - Estévez-Loureiro, Rodrigo
AU - Amat-Santos, Ignacio J.
AU - Mylotte, Darren
AU - Andreas, Martin
AU - Bunc, Matjaž
AU - Tarantini, Giuseppe
AU - Nombela-Franco, Luis
AU - Sondergaard, Lars
AU - Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
AU - Finkelstein, Ariel
AU - Kornowski, Ran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Europa Digital & Publishing 2022. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Background: The mean age of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients is steadily decreasing. Aims: The aim of the study was to describe the characteristics, the indications for and the outcomes of TAVI in patients <70 years old. Methods: All patients undergoing TAVI (n=8,626) from the 18 participating centres between January 2007 and June 2020 were stratified by age (</>70). For patients <70, the indications for TAVI were extracted from Heart Team discussions and the baseline characteristics and mortality were compared between the two groups. Results: Overall, 640 (7.4%) patients were <70 (9.1% during 2018-2020, p<0.001); the mean age was 65.0±2.3 years. The younger patients were more often male, with bicuspid valves or needing valve-in-valve procedures. They had a higher prevalence of lung disease and diabetes. In 80.7% of cases, the Heart Team estimated an increased surgical risk and TAVI was selected, reflected by an STS score >4% in 20.4%. Five-year mortality was similar (29.4 vs 29.8%, HR 0.95, p=0.432) in the <70 and >70 groups. In the <70 group, mortality was higher for those referred for TAVI due to an increased surgical risk compared to those referred for other reasons (31.6 vs 24.5%, HR 1.23, p=0.021). Mortality was similar regardless of the STS stratum in patients judged by the Heart Team to be at increased surgical risk (32.6 vs 30.4%, HR 0.98, p=0.715). Conclusions: Use of TAVI in patients <70 is becoming more frequent. The main reason for choosing TAVI is due to an increased surgical risk not adequately represented by the STS score. The outcomes for these patients are similar to those for older TAVI patients. Dedicated trials of TAVI/SAVR in younger patients are needed to guide decisions concerning expansion of TAVI indications.
AB - Background: The mean age of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) patients is steadily decreasing. Aims: The aim of the study was to describe the characteristics, the indications for and the outcomes of TAVI in patients <70 years old. Methods: All patients undergoing TAVI (n=8,626) from the 18 participating centres between January 2007 and June 2020 were stratified by age (</>70). For patients <70, the indications for TAVI were extracted from Heart Team discussions and the baseline characteristics and mortality were compared between the two groups. Results: Overall, 640 (7.4%) patients were <70 (9.1% during 2018-2020, p<0.001); the mean age was 65.0±2.3 years. The younger patients were more often male, with bicuspid valves or needing valve-in-valve procedures. They had a higher prevalence of lung disease and diabetes. In 80.7% of cases, the Heart Team estimated an increased surgical risk and TAVI was selected, reflected by an STS score >4% in 20.4%. Five-year mortality was similar (29.4 vs 29.8%, HR 0.95, p=0.432) in the <70 and >70 groups. In the <70 group, mortality was higher for those referred for TAVI due to an increased surgical risk compared to those referred for other reasons (31.6 vs 24.5%, HR 1.23, p=0.021). Mortality was similar regardless of the STS stratum in patients judged by the Heart Team to be at increased surgical risk (32.6 vs 30.4%, HR 0.98, p=0.715). Conclusions: Use of TAVI in patients <70 is becoming more frequent. The main reason for choosing TAVI is due to an increased surgical risk not adequately represented by the STS score. The outcomes for these patients are similar to those for older TAVI patients. Dedicated trials of TAVI/SAVR in younger patients are needed to guide decisions concerning expansion of TAVI indications.
KW - TAVI
KW - multidisciplinary Heart Team
KW - risk stratification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127729886&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00613
DO - 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00613
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34673502
AN - SCOPUS:85127729886
SN - 1774-024X
VL - 17
SP - 1289
EP - 1297
JO - EuroIntervention
JF - EuroIntervention
IS - 16
ER -