TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical outcomes in estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer patients with Recurrence Score 26-30
T2 - observational real-world cohort study
AU - Rotem, Ofer
AU - Peretz, Idit
AU - Leviov, Michelle
AU - Kuchuk, Iryna
AU - Itay, Amit
AU - Tokar, Margarita
AU - Paluch-Shimon, Shani
AU - Maimon, Ofra
AU - Yerushalmi, Rinat
AU - Drumea, Karen
AU - Evron, Ella
AU - Sonnenblick, Amir
AU - Gal-Yam, Einav
AU - Goldvaser, Hadar
AU - Samih, Yosef
AU - Merose, Rotem
AU - Bareket-Samish, Avital
AU - Soussan-Gutman, Lior
AU - Stemmer, Salomon M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Data on adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) benefit in ER + HER2‒ early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients with Recurrence Score (RS) 26-30 are limited. This real-world study evaluated the relationships between the RS, adjuvant treatments, and outcomes in 534 RS 26-30 patients tested through Clalit Health Services (N0: n = 394, 49% CT-treated; N1mi/N1: n = 140, 62% CT-treated). The CT-treated and untreated groups were imbalanced (more high-risk clinicopathologic characteristics in CT-treated patients). With median follow-up of 8 years, Kaplan–Meier estimates for overall survival (OS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and BC-specific mortality (BCSM) were not significantly different between CT-treated and untreated N0 patients. Seven-year rates (95% CI) in CT-treated vs untreated: OS, 97.9% (94.4–99.2%) vs 97.9% (94.6–99.2%); DRFS, 91.5% (86.6–94.7%) vs 91.2% (86.0–94.6%); BCSM, 0.5% (0.1–3.7%) vs 1.6% (0.5–4.7%). For N1mi/N1 patients, OS/DRFS did not differ significantly between treatment groups; whereas BCSM did (1.3% [0.2–8.6%] vs 6.2% [2.0–17.7%] for CT-treated and untreated patients, respectively, p = 0.024).
AB - Data on adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) benefit in ER + HER2‒ early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients with Recurrence Score (RS) 26-30 are limited. This real-world study evaluated the relationships between the RS, adjuvant treatments, and outcomes in 534 RS 26-30 patients tested through Clalit Health Services (N0: n = 394, 49% CT-treated; N1mi/N1: n = 140, 62% CT-treated). The CT-treated and untreated groups were imbalanced (more high-risk clinicopathologic characteristics in CT-treated patients). With median follow-up of 8 years, Kaplan–Meier estimates for overall survival (OS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and BC-specific mortality (BCSM) were not significantly different between CT-treated and untreated N0 patients. Seven-year rates (95% CI) in CT-treated vs untreated: OS, 97.9% (94.4–99.2%) vs 97.9% (94.6–99.2%); DRFS, 91.5% (86.6–94.7%) vs 91.2% (86.0–94.6%); BCSM, 0.5% (0.1–3.7%) vs 1.6% (0.5–4.7%). For N1mi/N1 patients, OS/DRFS did not differ significantly between treatment groups; whereas BCSM did (1.3% [0.2–8.6%] vs 6.2% [2.0–17.7%] for CT-treated and untreated patients, respectively, p = 0.024).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161054799&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41523-023-00549-8
DO - 10.1038/s41523-023-00549-8
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 37268607
AN - SCOPUS:85161054799
SN - 2374-4677
VL - 9
JO - npj Breast Cancer
JF - npj Breast Cancer
IS - 1
M1 - 49
ER -