TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical impact of allergy and pre-medication in CT studies with low-osmolality intravenous iodinated contrast media
AU - Talmon, A.
AU - Tal, Y.
AU - Moss, J.
AU - Hershkowitz, I.
AU - Shaham, D.
AU - Sosna, J.
AU - Hershko, A. Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - AIM: To evaluate the occurrence and severity of allergic reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM), including associated risk factors and the impact of pre-medication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on patients who had experienced allergic reactions during outpatient computed tomography (CT) examinations between January 2014 and September 2018 were analysed retrospectively. Response severity was assessed according to validated criteria. A control group was selected among individuals who underwent CT during the study period and did not experience allergic reactions. RESULTS: Screening of 36,920 CT studies revealed 74 (0.2%) individuals with systemic reactions to ICM. No significant differences in patient characteristics were found among patients who experienced mild (n=54), moderate (n=17), or severe (n=4) reactions. Previous ICM allergy was reported in 10 patients (13.3%). Patients with a history of ICM allergy had mild (9/10) or moderate (1/10) reactions, with one individual showing decreased intensity of the allergic response compared to a previous event. Within the control group, four patients (4%) had previous ICM allergy. In these individuals, lack of allergic reactions could not be attributed to pre-medication. All patients with severe reactions did not have a prior history of ICM allergy. CONCLUSION: Severe allergic reactions to ICM are rare, lack significant risk factors, and do not appear to be impacted by pre-medication. The findings presented herein highlight the need for prospective work that will re-evaluate the yield of pre-medication protocols.
AB - AIM: To evaluate the occurrence and severity of allergic reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM), including associated risk factors and the impact of pre-medication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on patients who had experienced allergic reactions during outpatient computed tomography (CT) examinations between January 2014 and September 2018 were analysed retrospectively. Response severity was assessed according to validated criteria. A control group was selected among individuals who underwent CT during the study period and did not experience allergic reactions. RESULTS: Screening of 36,920 CT studies revealed 74 (0.2%) individuals with systemic reactions to ICM. No significant differences in patient characteristics were found among patients who experienced mild (n=54), moderate (n=17), or severe (n=4) reactions. Previous ICM allergy was reported in 10 patients (13.3%). Patients with a history of ICM allergy had mild (9/10) or moderate (1/10) reactions, with one individual showing decreased intensity of the allergic response compared to a previous event. Within the control group, four patients (4%) had previous ICM allergy. In these individuals, lack of allergic reactions could not be attributed to pre-medication. All patients with severe reactions did not have a prior history of ICM allergy. CONCLUSION: Severe allergic reactions to ICM are rare, lack significant risk factors, and do not appear to be impacted by pre-medication. The findings presented herein highlight the need for prospective work that will re-evaluate the yield of pre-medication protocols.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122142103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.crad.2021.12.009
DO - 10.1016/j.crad.2021.12.009
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34973806
AN - SCOPUS:85122142103
SN - 0009-9260
VL - 77
SP - 210
EP - 215
JO - Clinical Radiology
JF - Clinical Radiology
IS - 3
ER -