TY - JOUR
T1 - Cilta-cel or Standard Care in Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma
AU - San-Miguel, Jesús
AU - Dhakal, Binod
AU - Yong, Kwee
AU - Spencer, Andrew
AU - Anguille, Sébastien
AU - Mateos, María Victoria
AU - Fernández De Larrea, Carlos
AU - Martínez-López, Joaquín
AU - Moreau, Philippe
AU - Touzeau, Cyrille
AU - Leleu, Xavier
AU - Avivi, Irit
AU - Cavo, Michele
AU - Ishida, Tadao
AU - Kim, Seok Jin
AU - Roeloffzen, Wilfried
AU - Van De Donk, Niels W.C.J.
AU - Dytfeld, Dominik
AU - Sidana, Surbhi
AU - Costa, Luciano J.
AU - Oriol, Albert
AU - Popat, Rakesh
AU - Khan, Abdullah M.
AU - Cohen, Yaël C.
AU - Ho, P. Joy
AU - Griffin, James
AU - Lendvai, Nikoletta
AU - Lonardi, Carolina
AU - Slaughter, Ana
AU - Schecter, Jordan M.
AU - Jackson, Carolyn C.
AU - Connors, Kaitlyn
AU - Li, Katherine
AU - Zudaire, Enrique
AU - Chen, Diana
AU - Gilbert, Jane
AU - Yeh, Tzu Min
AU - Nagle, Sarah
AU - Florendo, Erika
AU - Pacaud, Lida
AU - Patel, Nitin
AU - Harrison, Simon J.
AU - Einsele, Hermann
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR T-cell therapy, is effective in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We investigated cilta-cel in earlier treatment lines in patients with lenalidomide-refractory disease. Methods In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, we assigned patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma to receive cilta-cel or the physician's choice of effective standard care. All the patients had received one to three previous lines of treatment. The primary outcome was progression-free survival. Results A total of 419 patients underwent randomization (208 to receive cilta-cel and 211 to receive standard care). At a median follow-up of 15.9 months (range, 0.1 to 27.3), the median progression-free survival was not reached in the cilta-cel group and was 11.8 months in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.38; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 12 months was 75.9% (95% CI, 69.4 to 81.1) in the cilta-cel group and 48.6% (95% CI, 41.5 to 55.3) in the standard-care group. More patients in the cilta-cel group than in the standard-care group had an overall response (84.6% vs. 67.3%), a complete response or better (73.1% vs. 21.8%), and an absence of minimal residual disease (60.6% vs. 15.6%). Death from any cause was reported in 39 patients and 46 patients, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.2). Most patients reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events during treatment. Among the 176 patients who received cilta-cel in the as-treated population, 134 (76.1%) had cytokine release syndrome (grade 3 or 4, 1.1%; no grade 5), 8 (4.5%) had immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (all grade 1 or 2), 1 had movement and neurocognitive symptoms (grade 1), 16 (9.1%) had cranial nerve palsy (grade 2, 8.0%; grade 3, 1.1%), and 5 (2.8%) had CAR-T-related peripheral neuropathy (grade 1 or 2, 2.3%; grade 3, 0.6%). Conclusions A single cilta-cel infusion resulted in a lower risk of disease progression or death than standard care in lenalidomide-refractory patients with multiple myeloma who had received one to three previous therapies. (Funded by Janssen and Legend Biotech; CARTITUDE-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04181827.)
AB - Background Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR T-cell therapy, is effective in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We investigated cilta-cel in earlier treatment lines in patients with lenalidomide-refractory disease. Methods In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, we assigned patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma to receive cilta-cel or the physician's choice of effective standard care. All the patients had received one to three previous lines of treatment. The primary outcome was progression-free survival. Results A total of 419 patients underwent randomization (208 to receive cilta-cel and 211 to receive standard care). At a median follow-up of 15.9 months (range, 0.1 to 27.3), the median progression-free survival was not reached in the cilta-cel group and was 11.8 months in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.38; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 12 months was 75.9% (95% CI, 69.4 to 81.1) in the cilta-cel group and 48.6% (95% CI, 41.5 to 55.3) in the standard-care group. More patients in the cilta-cel group than in the standard-care group had an overall response (84.6% vs. 67.3%), a complete response or better (73.1% vs. 21.8%), and an absence of minimal residual disease (60.6% vs. 15.6%). Death from any cause was reported in 39 patients and 46 patients, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.2). Most patients reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events during treatment. Among the 176 patients who received cilta-cel in the as-treated population, 134 (76.1%) had cytokine release syndrome (grade 3 or 4, 1.1%; no grade 5), 8 (4.5%) had immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (all grade 1 or 2), 1 had movement and neurocognitive symptoms (grade 1), 16 (9.1%) had cranial nerve palsy (grade 2, 8.0%; grade 3, 1.1%), and 5 (2.8%) had CAR-T-related peripheral neuropathy (grade 1 or 2, 2.3%; grade 3, 0.6%). Conclusions A single cilta-cel infusion resulted in a lower risk of disease progression or death than standard care in lenalidomide-refractory patients with multiple myeloma who had received one to three previous therapies. (Funded by Janssen and Legend Biotech; CARTITUDE-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04181827.)
KW - Hematology/Oncology
KW - Leukemia/Lymphoma
KW - Treatments in Oncology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164409382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa2303379
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa2303379
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 37272512
AN - SCOPUS:85164409382
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 389
SP - 335
EP - 347
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 4
ER -