Choosing the best systemic treatment sequence for control of tumour growth in gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs): What is the recent evidence?

Maria Passhak, Mairéad G. McNamara, Richard A. Hubner, Irit Ben-Aharon, Juan W. Valle*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) represent a rare and highly heterogeneous entity with increasing incidence. Based on the results obtained from several trials performed in the last decade, various therapeutic options have been established for the treatment of patients with GEP-NETs. The options include somatostatin analogues, targeted therapies (sunitinib and everolimus), chemotherapy (with temozolomide or streptozocin-based regimens), and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. The treatment choice is influenced by various clinico-pathological factors including tumour grade and morphology, the primary mass location, hormone secretion, the volume of the disease and the rate of tumour growth, as well as patient comorbidities and performance status. In this review, the efficacy and safety of treatment options for patients with GEP-NETs is discussed and the evidence to inform the best sequence of available therapies to control tumour growth, prolong patient survival, and to lower potential toxicity, while maintaining patient quality of life is explored.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101836
JournalBest Practice and Research: Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • PRRT
  • chemotherapy
  • gastro–enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours
  • somatostatin analogue
  • targeted therapy
  • treatment sequence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing the best systemic treatment sequence for control of tumour growth in gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs): What is the recent evidence?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this