ChatGPT in the public eye: Ethical principles and generative concerns in social media discussions

Maayan Cohen*, Michael Khavkin, Danielle Movsowitz Davidow, Eran Toch

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

With ChatGPT’s rapid adoption, concerns regarding generative artificial intelligence (AI) have shifted from theoretical to practical. Drawing upon the “algorithmic imaginary” framework from critical algorithm studies and the anthropological concept of “ordinary ethics,” we analyzed Twitter discourse during ChatGPT’s initial deployment, examining 368,359 tweets. Our analysis identified five topics reflecting functional and critical aspects of ChatGPT. We specifically point to two topics with a critical perspective: “Ethics” and “Concerns.” The first aligns with scholarly discussions in AI ethics on fairness and transparency, while the second focuses on ChatGPT’s generative capabilities. This highlights an emerging trend: While the academic discussion on AI ethics has gained popularity, especially in scrutinizing ChatGPT, the conversation is now expanding to more nuanced ethical deliberations. We analyzed the posts’ engagement and sentiment over time, demonstrating the AI ethics community’s influence in addressing the potential and harms of generative AI systems.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNew Media and Society
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • AI ethics
  • ChatGPT
  • Twitter
  • algorithm
  • algorithmic imaginary
  • discourse
  • early adoption
  • generative AI
  • ordinary ethics
  • user agency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ChatGPT in the public eye: Ethical principles and generative concerns in social media discussions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this