TY - JOUR
T1 - Charge transfer and transport in DNA
AU - Jortner, Joshua
AU - Bixon, Mordechai
AU - Langenbacher, Thomas
AU - Michel-Beyerle, Maria E.
PY - 1998/10/27
Y1 - 1998/10/27
N2 - We explore charge migration in DNA, advancing two distinct mechanisms of charge separation in a donor (d)-bridge ({B(j)})-acceptor (a) system, where {B(j)} = B1,B2,..., B(N) are the N-specific adjacent bases of B-DNA: (i) two-center unistep superexchange induced charge transfer, d*{B(j)}a → d(±){B(j)}a(±), and (ii) multistep charge transport involves charge injection from d* (or d+) to {B(j)}, charge hopping within {B(j)}, and charge trapping by a. For off-resonance coupling, mechanism i prevails with the charge separation rate and yield exhibiting an exponential dependence ∞ exp(-βR) on the d-a distance (R). Resonance coupling results in mechanism ii with the charge separation lifetime τ ∞ N(η) and yield Y ≃ (1 + δ N(η))-1 exhibiting a weak (algebraic) N and distance dependence. The power parameter η is determined by charge hopping random walk. Energetic control of the charge migration mechanism is exerted by the energetics of the ion pair state d(±)B1(±)B2...B(N)a relative to the electronically excited donor doorway state d*B1B2... B(N)a. The realization of charge separation via superexchange or hopping is determined by the base sequence within the bridge. Our energetic-dynamic relations, in conjunction with the energetic data for d*/d- and for B/B+, determine the realization of the two distinct mechanisms in different hole donor systems, establishing the conditions for 'chemistry at a distance' after charge transport in DNA. The energetic control of the charge migration mechanisms attained by the sequence specificity of the bridge is universal for large molecular-scale systems, for proteins, and for DNA.
AB - We explore charge migration in DNA, advancing two distinct mechanisms of charge separation in a donor (d)-bridge ({B(j)})-acceptor (a) system, where {B(j)} = B1,B2,..., B(N) are the N-specific adjacent bases of B-DNA: (i) two-center unistep superexchange induced charge transfer, d*{B(j)}a → d(±){B(j)}a(±), and (ii) multistep charge transport involves charge injection from d* (or d+) to {B(j)}, charge hopping within {B(j)}, and charge trapping by a. For off-resonance coupling, mechanism i prevails with the charge separation rate and yield exhibiting an exponential dependence ∞ exp(-βR) on the d-a distance (R). Resonance coupling results in mechanism ii with the charge separation lifetime τ ∞ N(η) and yield Y ≃ (1 + δ N(η))-1 exhibiting a weak (algebraic) N and distance dependence. The power parameter η is determined by charge hopping random walk. Energetic control of the charge migration mechanism is exerted by the energetics of the ion pair state d(±)B1(±)B2...B(N)a relative to the electronically excited donor doorway state d*B1B2... B(N)a. The realization of charge separation via superexchange or hopping is determined by the base sequence within the bridge. Our energetic-dynamic relations, in conjunction with the energetic data for d*/d- and for B/B+, determine the realization of the two distinct mechanisms in different hole donor systems, establishing the conditions for 'chemistry at a distance' after charge transport in DNA. The energetic control of the charge migration mechanisms attained by the sequence specificity of the bridge is universal for large molecular-scale systems, for proteins, and for DNA.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032573170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1073/pnas.95.22.12759
DO - 10.1073/pnas.95.22.12759
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 9788986
AN - SCOPUS:0032573170
SN - 0027-8424
VL - 95
SP - 12759
EP - 12765
JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
IS - 22
ER -