Characterizing high-risk enrollment criteria and impact on clinical outcomes in a large randomized clinical trial: Insights from the TWILIGHT trial

Philippe Gabriel Steg, Johny Nicolas, Usman Baber, Samantha Sartori, Zhongjie Zhang, Yihan Feng, Dominick J. Angiolillo, Carlo Briguori, David J. Cohen, Timothy Collier, George Dangas, Dariusz Dudek, Javier Escaned, C. Michael Gibson, Ya Ling Han, Kurt Huber, Adnan Kastrati, Upendra Kaul, Steven O. Marx, Ran KornowskiVijay Kunadian, Birgit Vogel, Angelo Oliva, Shamir R. Mehta, David Moliterno, Gennaro Sardella, Mitchell Krucoff, Richard A. Shlofmitz, Samin Sharma, Stuart Pocock, Roxana Mehran*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The TWILIGHT trial showed that, among high-risk patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and were event-free at 3 months, ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin reduced bleeding without increasing ischemic events. Methods: This posthoc analysis describes the risk profiles and outcomes of patients enrolled in the TWILIGHT trial. The primary outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, and the key secondary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke within 1 year after randomization. Results: The proportion of patients (n = 7,119) fulfilling ≤ 3, 4, 5, or ≥ 6 risk factors was 21.5%, 32.7%, 27.4%, and 18.4%, respectively. Troponin-positive acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was the most prevalent clinical criterion (64.9%), and multivessel disease (MVD) was the most prevalent angiographic criterion (66.5%). The most frequent intersection of criteria was the combination of troponin-positive ACS, atherosclerotic vascular disease, MVD, left main or proximal anterior descending lesion, and stent length > 30 mm. A stepwise increase in ischemic but not in bleeding risk was noted with an increasing number of high-risk criteria. Compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, ticagrelor monotherapy reduced bleeding regardless of the number of risk factors (≤ 3-RF: 3.5% vs 5.8%, HR 0.59, 95% CI [0.38-0.93]; 4-RF: 3.7% vs 6.4%, HR 0.57, 95% CI [0.37-0.86]; 5-RF: 3.8% vs 8.6%, HR 0.44, 95% CI [0.29-0.66]; ≥ 6-RF: 5.3% vs 7.9%, HR 0.65, 95% CI [0.44-0.96]; p-interaction = .56) without significantly increasing the ischemic risk (≤ 3-RF: 1.6% vs 2.1%, HR 0.75, 95% CI [0.38-1.50]; 4-RF: 3.5% vs 2.2%, HR 1.58, 95% CI [0.91-2.75]; 5-RF: 4.1% vs 5.0%, HR 0.80, 95% CI [0.51-1.24]; ≥ 6-RF: 6.7% vs 6.9%, HR 0.98, 95% CI [0.67-1.43]; p-interaction = .22). Conclusions: In the TWILIGHT trial, the high-risk features correlated more strongly with ischemic than with bleeding risk. Nonetheless, the benefits of ticagrelor compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin were consistent, irrespective of the number of high-risk features. These findings are only applicable to patients who are event-free at 3 months after PCI. Clinical trial registration: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02270242.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-107
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume286
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
AstraZeneca

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Characterizing high-risk enrollment criteria and impact on clinical outcomes in a large randomized clinical trial: Insights from the TWILIGHT trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this