Character displacement and release in the small Indian mongoose, Herpestes javanicus

In western part of its native range, the small Indian mongoose (Herpestes javanicus) is sympatric with one or both of two slightly larger congeners. In the eastern part of its range, these species are absent. The small Indian mongoose was introduced, about a century ago, to the West Indies, the Hawaiian islands, Mauritius, the Fijian islands, and Okinawa. All introductions except possibly that to Mauritius were from the region of Calcutta and Bangladesh, where it is sympatric with both congeners. No other mongoose is present on any of these islands. In each instance, the introduced population derived from a small propagule. We examined size variation in the maximum diameter of the upper canine tooth (the prey-killing organ and skull length. In the eastern (allopatric) part of its native range, males of the small Indian mongoose are much larger in both traits than in the western (sympatric) regions, approaching the size of the smaller of its absent two congeners, Herpestes edwardsii. Females from the allopatric part of the range are also larger than those of the source region. The species is more sexually dimorphic in the region of allopatry. On all islands to which it has been introduced, in 100-200 generations the small Indian mongoose has increased in male size and in sexual dimorphism; changes in female size have been slight and inconsistent. In general, sizes of island individuals are approximately intermediated in size between those in the region of origin (where they are sympatric and small) and those in the region of allopatry. Sexual dimorphism is greatest for canine diameter. Thus, H. javanicus shows variation consistent with ecological release from competition with its congeners. There is no evidence on whether this variation is genetic, nor on what dietary items might be partitioned between species and between sexes. However, morphological variation is consistently smaller for both traits and both sexes on the islands of introduction than in any part of the native range, consistent with idea of a genetic bottleneck imposed by the small propagule sized. Neither of the two congeneric mongooses shows morphological variation consistent with ecological release from competition with H. javanicus in the southern part of their ranges, where the latter species is absent.