TY - JOUR
T1 - Cesarean delivery due to nonreassuring fetal heart rate
T2 - the effect of phase of labor on subsequent vaginal delivery success
AU - Ganer Herman, Hadas
AU - Kogan, Zviya
AU - Bar-Nof, Tahel
AU - Bar, Jacob
AU - Kovo, Michal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/11/16
Y1 - 2020/11/16
N2 - Introduction: To assess trial of labor and vaginal delivery rates in pregnancies following cesarean delivery (CD) due to nonreassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR) according to phase of labor at cesarean. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cohort of deliveries at a university hospital between 2009 and 2016. We compared primary CDs performed due to NRFHR during nonactive labor (cervical dilatation < 5 cm) and active labor (cervical dilatation ≥ 5 cm). Subsequent deliveries were reviewed for trial of labor and vaginal delivery rates, and maternal and obstetric outcomes compared. Results: Two hundred thirty-six patients underwent a CD during the nonactive phase of labor (nonactive phase group) and 126 patients during the active phase of labor (active phase group). Patients with a past active phase CD were more likely to attempt a trial of labor but equally likely to achieve a vaginal delivery. There was a trend for more CDs due to nonprogressive labor in this group. After adjustment, only past vaginal delivery was independently associated with a successful vaginal delivery, but not the phase of labor during which the past CD was performed. Conclusion: Our study points to a similar prognosis for patients with a past CD due to NRFHR, regardless of previous labor course.
AB - Introduction: To assess trial of labor and vaginal delivery rates in pregnancies following cesarean delivery (CD) due to nonreassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR) according to phase of labor at cesarean. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cohort of deliveries at a university hospital between 2009 and 2016. We compared primary CDs performed due to NRFHR during nonactive labor (cervical dilatation < 5 cm) and active labor (cervical dilatation ≥ 5 cm). Subsequent deliveries were reviewed for trial of labor and vaginal delivery rates, and maternal and obstetric outcomes compared. Results: Two hundred thirty-six patients underwent a CD during the nonactive phase of labor (nonactive phase group) and 126 patients during the active phase of labor (active phase group). Patients with a past active phase CD were more likely to attempt a trial of labor but equally likely to achieve a vaginal delivery. There was a trend for more CDs due to nonprogressive labor in this group. After adjustment, only past vaginal delivery was independently associated with a successful vaginal delivery, but not the phase of labor during which the past CD was performed. Conclusion: Our study points to a similar prognosis for patients with a past CD due to NRFHR, regardless of previous labor course.
KW - Cesarean delivery
KW - nonreassuring fetal heart rate
KW - trial of labor after cesarean
KW - vaginal birth after cesarean
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062770574&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14767058.2019.1586876
DO - 10.1080/14767058.2019.1586876
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 30821554
AN - SCOPUS:85062770574
SN - 1476-7058
VL - 33
SP - 3798
EP - 3803
JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
IS - 22
ER -