Abstract
A recent proposal of a quantum eraser by Ingraham [Phys. Rev. A 50, 4502 (1994); 51, 4295(E) (1995)] is analyzed. It is shown that Ingrahams predictions contradict relativistic causality and, therefore, cannot be right. A subtle quantum effect that was overlooked by Ingraham is explained.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4984-4985 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Physical Review A |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1995 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Causality, memory erasing, and delayed-choice experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver