Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: International consensus statement on classification criteria and treatment guidelines

R. A. Asherson, R. Cervera, P. G. De Groot, D. Erkan, M. C. Boffa, J. C. Piette, M. A. Khamashta, Y. Shoenfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The term 'catastrophic' antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is used to define an accelerated form of APS resulting in multiorgan failure. Although catastrophic APS patients represent less than 1% of all patients with APS, they are usually in a life-threatening medical situation that requires high clinical awareness. The careful and open discussion of several proposals by all participants in the presymposium workshop on APS consensus, held in Taormina on occasion of the 10th International Congress on aPL and chaired by Munther A Khamashta and Yehuda Shoenfeld (29 September 2002), has allowed the acceptation of a preliminary set of classification criteria. On the other hand, the optimal management of catastrophic APS must have three clear aims: to treat any precipitating factors (prompt use of antibiotics if infection is suspected, amputation for any necrotic organ, high awareness in patients with APS who undergo an operation or an invasive procedure), to prevent and to treat the ongoing thrombotic events and to suppress the excessive cytokine 'storm'. Anticoagulation (usually intravenous heparin followed by oral anticoagulants), corticosteroids, plasma exchange, intravenous gammaglobulins and, if associated with lupus flare, cyclophosphamide, are the most commonly used treatments for catastrophic APS patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)530-534
Number of pages5
JournalLupus
Volume12
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anticardiolipin antibodies
  • Antiphospholipid antibodies
  • Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome
  • Lupus anticoagulant
  • Plasma exchange

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: International consensus statement on classification criteria and treatment guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this