Case-control study of screening colonoscopy in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer

Yaron Niv, Ram Dickman, Arie Figer, Galia Abuksis, Gerald Fraser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of colonoscopic screening and polypectomy for the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) is well accepted but has never been documented in a prospective, controlled study. Screening by sigmoidoscopy has been found to reduce mortality from cancer of the rectum and distal colon. Case-control studies provide an alternative method for determining the efficacy of screening methods. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2000, a total of 40 subjects were found to have CRC (study group) and 160 had a normal colon (control group) among asymptomatic individuals participating in a screening colonoscopy program for a high-risk population of first-degree relatives of CRC patients. We compared these groups for screening by fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, barium enema, and colonoscopy in the 10-yr period before the index colonoscopy. RESULTS: Screening colonoscopy was performed in only 2.5% of the case subjects and 48.7% of controls (p < 0.0001), and all screening procedures in 12.5% and 73.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001). A statistically significant difference was also found for screening with fecal occult blood test, but not for flexible sigmoidoscopy or barium enema. Significant adenomatous polyps >1 cm in diameter were detected and removed in 19% of the control group within 10 yr of the index colonoscopy. Six (15%) of the patients in the study group died of CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Screening by colonoscopy can prevent progression to CRC from adenomatous polyps and may reduce the mortality associated with this devastating disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)486-489
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume98
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Case-control study of screening colonoscopy in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this