Cascade equilibrium strategies in a two-server queueing system with inspection cost

  • Refael Hassin
  • , Ricky Roet-Green*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Time-sensitive customers arriving to a system of parallel servers will search for the least congested queue. However, customers do not always have full information of the system state, because the search is associated with a cost. We present a model of parallel queues in front of two servers that provide the same service. Upon arrival, each customer inspects the queue in front of one server before either joining it or inspecting the other. If both queues were inspected, the customer joins the inspected queue that minimizes sojourn time. The solution of this model is not straightforward, even when the system contains only two servers, and the equilibrium is not always a threshold strategy. We show that, in many cases, a unique equilibrium strategy that contains cascades exists: customers choose one action (join or inspect) when they observe i and i+2 customers in the first observed queue, and the other action when they observe i+1 customers in the first observed queue. We find cascade equilibrium strategies even when the servers are identical with respect to service rate or inspection cost. We also show that compared to the case where all customers first inspect the same queue, symmetric inspection reduces system load but not necessarily customers’ expected cost.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1014-1026
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Volume267
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 16 Jun 2018

Funding

FundersFunder number
Israel Science Foundation1015/11

    Keywords

    • Game theory
    • Markovian queues
    • Queueing systems
    • Service operations

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cascade equilibrium strategies in a two-server queueing system with inspection cost'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this