Carbapenem stewardship: Does ertapenem affect Pseudomonas susceptibility to other carbapenems? A review of the evidence

David P. Nicolau*, Yehuda Carmeli, Christopher W. Crank, Debra A. Goff, Christopher J. Graber, Ana Lucia L. Lima, Ellie J.C. Goldstein

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

57 Scopus citations

Abstract

The group 2 carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem and, more recently, doripenem) have been a mainstay of treatment for patients with serious hospital infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacteriaceae and other difficult-to-treat Gram-negative pathogens as well as mixed aerobic/anaerobic infections. When ertapenem, a group 1 carbapenem, was introduced, questions were raised about the potential for ertapenem to select for imipenem- and meropenem-resistant Pseudomonas. Results from ten clinical studies evaluating the effect of ertapenem use on the susceptibility of Pseudomonas to carbapenems have uniformly shown that ertapenem use does not result in decreased Pseudomonas susceptibility to these antipseudomonal carbapenems. Here we review these studies evaluating the evidence of how ertapenem use affects P. aeruginosa as well as provide considerations for ertapenem use in the context of institutional stewardship initiatives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-15
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
Merck

    Keywords

    • Carbapenem
    • Ecology
    • Ertapenem
    • Pseudomonas
    • Stewardship
    • Susceptibility

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Carbapenem stewardship: Does ertapenem affect Pseudomonas susceptibility to other carbapenems? A review of the evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this