TY - JOUR
T1 - Cancer diagnosis among women with recurrent pregnancy loss
T2 - a retrospective cohort study
AU - Cahen-Peretz, Adva
AU - Haas, Jigal
AU - Hadi, Efrat
AU - Carp, Howard
AU - Hershko Klement, Anat
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Research question: What is relationship between unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and risk of cancer morbidity? Design: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted, based on data from a tertiary medical centre. RPL cases (exposed) were defined as women presenting with three or more unexplained confirmed pregnancy losses at 5–24 weeks, whose first visit to the RPL clinic was between 1990 and 2010. The unexposed group included women giving birth who were not RPL patients; these were matched by age and year of giving birth/admission (1:5 ratio). Data from the RPL and the live birth registries were cross-linked to the Israeli national cancer registry according to the unique ID number and merged into one database. Results: The study group comprised 937 RPL patients who were matched by maternal age (P = 1.0) and admission date (P = 0.84) to 4685 women achieving a live birth. There was no difference in overall cancer incidence between groups (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–1.03; P = 0.08). The secondary RPL group showed a trend towards decreased cancer morbidity incidence compared with primary RPL (adjusted OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.41–1.03; P = 0.07). Analysis by cancer type showed a similar risk for breast cancer among women with RPL compared with live birth, but a significantly lower risk for gynaecological cancers among women with RPL (adjusted OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08–0.79; P = 0.018). Conclusions: Unexplained RPL may be related to a lower risk of gynaecological cancers, possibly explained by hyper-responsive immunological mechanisms involving uterine natural killer cells.
AB - Research question: What is relationship between unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and risk of cancer morbidity? Design: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted, based on data from a tertiary medical centre. RPL cases (exposed) were defined as women presenting with three or more unexplained confirmed pregnancy losses at 5–24 weeks, whose first visit to the RPL clinic was between 1990 and 2010. The unexposed group included women giving birth who were not RPL patients; these were matched by age and year of giving birth/admission (1:5 ratio). Data from the RPL and the live birth registries were cross-linked to the Israeli national cancer registry according to the unique ID number and merged into one database. Results: The study group comprised 937 RPL patients who were matched by maternal age (P = 1.0) and admission date (P = 0.84) to 4685 women achieving a live birth. There was no difference in overall cancer incidence between groups (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–1.03; P = 0.08). The secondary RPL group showed a trend towards decreased cancer morbidity incidence compared with primary RPL (adjusted OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.41–1.03; P = 0.07). Analysis by cancer type showed a similar risk for breast cancer among women with RPL compared with live birth, but a significantly lower risk for gynaecological cancers among women with RPL (adjusted OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08–0.79; P = 0.018). Conclusions: Unexplained RPL may be related to a lower risk of gynaecological cancers, possibly explained by hyper-responsive immunological mechanisms involving uterine natural killer cells.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Gynaecological cancer
KW - Recurrent pregnancy loss
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118786718&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.08.001
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34686416
AN - SCOPUS:85118786718
SN - 1472-6483
VL - 43
SP - 1057
EP - 1062
JO - Reproductive BioMedicine Online
JF - Reproductive BioMedicine Online
IS - 6
ER -