TY - JOUR
T1 - Can we improve early identification of neonatal late-onset sepsis? A validated prediction model
AU - Goldberg, Ori
AU - Amitai, Nofar
AU - Chodick, Gabriel
AU - Bromiker, Reuben
AU - Scheuerman, Oded
AU - Ben-Zvi, Haim
AU - Klinger, Gil
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Objective: No single test can accurately identify neonatal late-onset sepsis (LOS). Our aim was to use clinical evaluation with laboratory tests to rapidly assess sepsis risk. Study design: A retrospective case-control study was performed in a tertiary Neonatal Center during the years 2016–2019. Infants with bacteriologically confirmed LOS were compared with control infants. A clinical health evaluation score was assigned to each infant. A prediction model was developed and validated by multivariable analysis. Results: The study included 145 infants, 48 with sepsis, and 97 controls. LOS was independently associated with: sick appearance (OR: 5.7, 95% CI: 1.1–29.1), C-reactive protein > 0.75 (OR: 5.4, 95% CI: 1.1–26.3), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 1.5 (OR: 6.7, 95% CI: 1.2–38.5). Our model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86–0.97). Conclusions: Clinical evaluation with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein can rapidly identify LOS enabling decreased health costs and antibiotic use.
AB - Objective: No single test can accurately identify neonatal late-onset sepsis (LOS). Our aim was to use clinical evaluation with laboratory tests to rapidly assess sepsis risk. Study design: A retrospective case-control study was performed in a tertiary Neonatal Center during the years 2016–2019. Infants with bacteriologically confirmed LOS were compared with control infants. A clinical health evaluation score was assigned to each infant. A prediction model was developed and validated by multivariable analysis. Results: The study included 145 infants, 48 with sepsis, and 97 controls. LOS was independently associated with: sick appearance (OR: 5.7, 95% CI: 1.1–29.1), C-reactive protein > 0.75 (OR: 5.4, 95% CI: 1.1–26.3), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 1.5 (OR: 6.7, 95% CI: 1.2–38.5). Our model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86–0.97). Conclusions: Clinical evaluation with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein can rapidly identify LOS enabling decreased health costs and antibiotic use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082198624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41372-020-0649-6
DO - 10.1038/s41372-020-0649-6
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 32203177
AN - SCOPUS:85082198624
SN - 0743-8346
VL - 40
SP - 1315
EP - 1322
JO - Journal of Perinatology
JF - Journal of Perinatology
IS - 9
ER -