Abstract
Several competition authorities consider the exemption of horizontal agreements among firms from antitrust liability if the agreements sufficiently promote public interest objectives such as sustainable consumption and production. We show that when consumers value sustainable products and firms choose investments in sustainability before choosing output or prices, coordination of output choices or prices boosts investments in sustainability and may even enhance consumer surplus when products are sufficiently close substitutes and the marginal cost of investment in sustainability is relatively low. By contrast, coordination of investments in sustainability leads to lower investments and harms consumers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 371-398 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | International Journal of Industrial Organization |
| Volume | 53 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Antitrust
- Collusion
- Consumer surplus
- Public interest
- Sustainability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can collusion promote sustainable consumption and production?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver