TY - JOUR
T1 - Bone mineral density in relation to efficacy and side effects of budesonide and prednisolone in Crohn's disease
AU - Schoon, Erik J.
AU - Bollani, Simona
AU - Mills, Peter R.
AU - Israeli, Eran
AU - Felsenberg, Dieter
AU - Ljunghall, Sverker
AU - Persson, Tore
AU - Haptén-White, Louise
AU - Graffner, Hans
AU - Porro, Gabriele Bianchi
AU - Vatn, Morten
AU - Stockbrügger, Reinhold W.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was performed in scientific collaboration with AstraZeneca Research and Development, Lund, Sweden, and financially supported by AstraZeneca Sweden. Dr Persson has been a full-time employee of AstraZeneca since 1982. Dr Hapten-White is a full-time employee of AstraZeneca. Dr Graffner is an employee of AstraZeneca. Dr Bianchi Porro has received financial support from AstraZeneca.
PY - 2005/2
Y1 - 2005/2
N2 - Background & Aims: Osteoporosis frequently occurs in Crohn's disease, often because of corticosteroids. Budesonide as controlled release capsules is a locally acting corticosteroid with low systemic bioavailability. We investigated its effects on bone compared with prednisolone. Methods: In 34 international centers, 272 patients with Crohn's disease involving ileum and/or colon ascendens were randomized to once daily treatment with budesonide or prednisolone for 2 years at doses adapted to disease activity. One hundred eighty-one corticosteroid-free patients had active disease (98 had never received corticosteroids, corticosteroid naive; 83 had received corticosteroids previously, corticosteroid exposed), and 90 had quiescent disease, receiving long-term low doses of corticosteroids, corticosteroid-dependent; in 1 patient, no efficacy data were obtained. Bone mineral density and fractures were assessed in a double-blinded fashion; disease activity, side effects, and quality of life were monitored. Results: Neither the corticosteroid-free nor the corticosteroid-dependent patients treated with budesonide differed significantly in bone mineral density from those receiving prednisolone. However, corticosteroid-naive patients receiving budesonide had smaller reductions in bone mineral density than those on prednisolone (mean, -1.04% vs -3.84%; P =. 0084). Treatment-emergent corticosteroid side effects were less frequent with budesonide. Efficacy was similar in both groups. Conclusions: Treatment with budesonide is associated with better preserved bone mass compared with prednisolone in only the corticosteroid-naive patients with active ileocecal Crohn's disease. In both the corticosteroid-free and corticosteroid-dependent groups, budesonide and prednisolone were equally effective for up to 2 years, but budesonide caused fewer corticosteroid side effects.
AB - Background & Aims: Osteoporosis frequently occurs in Crohn's disease, often because of corticosteroids. Budesonide as controlled release capsules is a locally acting corticosteroid with low systemic bioavailability. We investigated its effects on bone compared with prednisolone. Methods: In 34 international centers, 272 patients with Crohn's disease involving ileum and/or colon ascendens were randomized to once daily treatment with budesonide or prednisolone for 2 years at doses adapted to disease activity. One hundred eighty-one corticosteroid-free patients had active disease (98 had never received corticosteroids, corticosteroid naive; 83 had received corticosteroids previously, corticosteroid exposed), and 90 had quiescent disease, receiving long-term low doses of corticosteroids, corticosteroid-dependent; in 1 patient, no efficacy data were obtained. Bone mineral density and fractures were assessed in a double-blinded fashion; disease activity, side effects, and quality of life were monitored. Results: Neither the corticosteroid-free nor the corticosteroid-dependent patients treated with budesonide differed significantly in bone mineral density from those receiving prednisolone. However, corticosteroid-naive patients receiving budesonide had smaller reductions in bone mineral density than those on prednisolone (mean, -1.04% vs -3.84%; P =. 0084). Treatment-emergent corticosteroid side effects were less frequent with budesonide. Efficacy was similar in both groups. Conclusions: Treatment with budesonide is associated with better preserved bone mass compared with prednisolone in only the corticosteroid-naive patients with active ileocecal Crohn's disease. In both the corticosteroid-free and corticosteroid-dependent groups, budesonide and prednisolone were equally effective for up to 2 years, but budesonide caused fewer corticosteroid side effects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20844432689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00662-7
DO - 10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00662-7
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 15704045
AN - SCOPUS:20844432689
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 3
SP - 113
EP - 121
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 2
ER -